User talk:JayLv99

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page. To stay in Wikipedia, an article has to be about something notable, that is, of general interest. Click on Notability for an explanation of what that means. Also, it must give independently verifiable sources. Articles that don't meet these requirements are likely to be deleted. Follow the links below to learn more:

• To find out more about creating articles, read the Introduction and the Guide to creating your first article.
• You should not write articles about yourself, your band, or your best friend - that's a conflict of interest.
• Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - articles about future events, in particular, need reliable sources.
• Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Before writing about your own business, read Business' FAQ.
• For experiments, please use the sandbox.

JohnCD (talk) 14:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2081 (film)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 2081 (film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JohnCD (talk) 14:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello, JayLv99. You have new messages at JohnCD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

AfD nomination of 2081 (film)

An article that you have been involved in editing, 2081 (film), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2081 (film). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JohnCD (talk) 15:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Please don't be discouraged - it was a well-written and presented article, much better than most first articles, the only problem was lack iof independent reliable sources. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

• And JohnCD is quite correct. The article is much better than many... and simply lacks sufficient sourcing. Dig for 'em. Find 'em. Make 'em great. Keep improving the article... and in the meantime, go to the article, click "edit this page", do a "copy" of the entire thing, and then go to HERE to create your sanbox where you can then "paste" the entire article so as to continue working "just in case" it does not survive the AfD. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
• Further, you yourself have no "rush to publish". If it gets deleted, don't sweat it. As more sources become available, your ability to support the article become even stronger... and I think that even if it were to be deleted, it would be welcome to return in due course of time. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:15, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
• Other URL's for external links: New York Times artticle on Thor Halvorssen, Reason.com, TheFreeLibrary.com, URLFan, Atlasnetwork.tv, Finallyequal.com, brain-terminal.com, and I don't read or speak Russian (?). One or more of these might be helpful. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:28, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

2081 (film)

The film survived the AfD... but not a "keep"... only as a "no-consensus". It may be reyurned to an AfD by the same or another editor if they feel it has not been properly improved, as is their perogative. Let us both keeps our eyes open for continued mention of the film in the pres so the article can be continued to be improved... for trust me, it was close. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Need to source the deleted quote from Thor Halvorssen about Sundance and other festivals so it may be returned to the article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:20, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

There is a way to set up a ref so it can be used multiple times within one article. Over at WP:REFPUNC there is a section describing how this is done. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 14:54, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

When one is creating a reference that may be used a few times, instead of having REF inside the first < > brackets, one has REF NAME="(pick a short name)", and then the rest of the ref is finished as normal. Any subsequent use of the same ref all one needs do is use REF NAME="(that same name)"/ inside the < > brackets.

So I took care of it and brought you a sample. Do an edit to the following sentences so you can see just what this looks like:

The first time it is used looks like:

Any subsequent use of that same ref looks like:

MfD nomination of User:JayLv99/sandbox

User:JayLv99/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:JayLv99/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:JayLv99/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 17:43, 8 December 2012 (UTC)