User talk:Jcreighton1995

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jakob Creighton (Actor) (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FoCuSandLeArN was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jakob Creighton (Actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 19:32, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jcreighton1995, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 19:32, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jakob Creighton (Actor) (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jakob Creighton (Actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 22:21, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Diagnosed (TV Series)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Diagnosed (TV Series), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:54, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you because you seem to only be here to promote yourself and you've made at least one article that appears to be a blatant hoax, Draft:Diagnosed (TV Series). In that article you claimed the following:

That CBC would be making a TV series created by a 21 year old, who would also be one of the show's executive producers - and one of its stars and one of its writers.
That the show would have a cast of fairly well known actors and very well known guest actors, which includes "Lana Parilla, Nicole Kidman, Emilie de Ravin, Christine Baranski, and Angela Lansbury".
That despite no episodes having aired yet, CBC has signed the show for 30+ episodes that will air though 2020. This is also despite the fact that the vast majority of companies only create TV shows on a season by season basis, especially ones that have yet to debut.
The show supposedly began filming earlier this year, yet the main character hasn't been cast. (Especially concerning since this will be a weekly show that will air in four weeks.)

All of that alone is a bit much to believe, given that your IMDb page has almost no credits, assuming that any of that is true. What makes it even more of a blatant hoax is that there is zero coverage of this in the news, something that is hard to believe given that the show is slated to air in four weeks. TV companies want to ensure that they make back their investment, so they pepper media outlets with press releases and news tidbits about their upcoming shows, especially if they have notable actors guest starring. Lansbury herself would make headlines, as apart from one episode of Great Performances, has not been on television since 2005.

This means that I have to question how much truth is actually in the draft article you wrote for yourself and I have to assume that you have likely inserted falsehoods into that as well. Even if it was true, the article was repeatedly declined at AfC for a lack of overall notability. I can only assume that this is all an attempt to promote yourself on Wikipedia and you most recently decided to do this by creating a hoax. I'm sorry, but I'm blocking you from editing. You might be able to be unblocked, but you'd have to show that you understand why you were blocked, show that you understand that Wikipedia is not a place to promote falsehoods, and also agree not to write about yourself any further on Wikipedia - meaning that you would have to show us what you plan on doing if you are unblocked. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tokyogirl79, I do realize that the article was promoting myself and do recognize that doing so is grounds for blocking... though I was unaware that others could see the article. I was never actually going to publish it (and it was never meant for others to see)... I was simply fooling around with an actual concept that I created (and am currently writing the pilot for) and my dream cast for the show to see what it would look like if it was picked up as series and someone made a Wikipedia page for it (don't worry, it never would have actually been me). (And I am aware how a show is normally picked up: pre-development, development, pilot pre-production, pilot production, pilot post-production, pilot showing for executives, etc. ... again, simply fooling around). I never meant this as a hoax (again, to reiterate, I didn't know others could see it)... The concept actually was submitted to CBC Television, but I haven't heard back yet. I do apologize for this entire ordeal, and I feel terribly that people actually saw that (nobody other than the network executives I sent the concept to were supposed to see any of this... mostly because I didn't want anyone else to see it, also because I don't have it copyrighted yet...). Again, my sincerest apologies... I will no longer be using Wikipedia as a result.