User talk:Jeremybclark

License tagging for Image:VTNlogo1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:VTNlogo1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:16, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:VTNlogo2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:VTNlogo2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:28, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Agape college

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Agape college, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.agapecollege.com. As a copyright violation, Agape college appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Agape college has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Agape college. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Agape college, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- Merope 16:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am an employee of Agape and have permission. Jeremybclark 16:16, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Happy Caldwell) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Mhking 16:36, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agape Church

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Agape Church, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 17:38, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:VTNlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:VTNlogo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 19:27, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Agape Church (Little Rock, Arkansas)

The article Agape Church (Little Rock, Arkansas) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, per WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:46, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Agape College (Little Rock, Arkansas)

The article Agape College (Little Rock, Arkansas) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable college; could not find any reliable sources, and they don't even have a website. Article reads like a brochure and very little of it is salvageable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~EdGl! 03:52, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]