User talk:Jillsargeant

In response to your feedback

Hi Jillsargeant... The name is not permanent. It can be moved to fix the capitalization. No worries. :)

Wikipelli ^Talk 12:05, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jill! Drop by the Teahouse anytime!

Hello! Jillsargeant, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 02:17, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alicia Hayes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alicia Hayes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alicia Hayes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ariconte (talk) 06:19, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articone---article up for deletion (Alicia Hayes)

Thanks for your input...I'm new at this and it's my first article. I do hope that there is more that I can do to prevent this article from being deleted. I really thought I had all my bases covered! Please help. Thanks. Jillsargeant (talk) 09:09, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Hi Jillsargeant, and thank you for your feedback. It's okay to make mistakes in removing tags; you've indicated that you aren't going to do it again so there's no harm done.

As regards the deletion of Alicia Hayes, please see my comment at the deletion discussion (you're also welcome to contribute there, by the way). The paucity of sources makes it hard to argue for a solid Keep; if you can add more it stands a much better chance of survival. Remember, to pass the notability guidelines we need sources which are independent, in-depth and reliable.

Yunshui 雲‍水 09:12, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

This suggestion is the vote of Yunshui, so just a part of the ongoing process. This should run for 7 days, and then an administrator will close the discussion. So no need to merge at the moment, perhaps the article will stand.

Lectonar (talk) 10:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

We shall see; at the least you'll have learned rather a lot about Wikipedia policy, and the positive effects a discussion/consensus building can have. And I have to correct myself: we do not have a vote about the article, but rather a discussion. But I am just an old coot who does remember the old name of the process for deletions of articles. Enough blathering. Cheers and happy editing.

Lectonar (talk) 12:23, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

...for fixing this; I was obviously running low on caffeine... Yunshui 雲‍水 13:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOL

...no problem Yunshu! I enjoy and appreciate your gumption!Jillsargeant (talk) 19:54, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

For uploading pictures and other media, it's easiest to go to Wikimedia Commons (you can use your Wikipedia credentials if you're not logged in already) and visit the Upload Wizard. Wikimedia Commons can only accept files which anyone can use for any purpose. That means most content you find on the web is not acceptable. But for example, most photos that you've taken yourself are OK to upload.

Here's a screenshot of the Upload Wizard:

You start by selecting the files you want to upload, then you go step by step through the process. In the final step, you'll get some wiki markup that you can copy into a Wikipedia article. Let me know if I can help. :-)

Ariconte (talk) 01:34, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

See Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners

Ariconte (talk) 01:36, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You could do so much better.... The references in Birgit C. Muller are mostly bare ie; they don't contailn a bunch of useful detail. See Wikipedia:Bare URLs for the problems.... Try the cite tool, it makes it easy to do better:

There is a "Cite" toolbar at the top of the edit window which allows you to automatically generate the required wiki code.

You click one of the templates, e.g. "book", and fill in the details.

More information can be found in Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or the citations tutorial (the below video will play best in Firefox or Chrome):

Hope this helps, Regards, Ariconte (talk) 04:02, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alicia Hayes.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Shearonink (talk) 07:25, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

You can move the article or use {{DISPLAYTITLE:Your Title}}.

Kc kennylau (talk) 07:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Moving means changing the page title.

Charles (talk) 09:31, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Move an article means to have the title changed. You cannot change the title by editing because the title is defined when you create it. When a page is move, the old page will redirect to the new page.

Kc kennylau (talk) 09:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:37, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message sent with Global message delivery.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alicia Hayes concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alicia Hayes, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 12:01, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Alicia Hayes

Hello Jillsargeant. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Alicia Hayes.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alicia Hayes}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 23:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alicia Hayes concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Alicia Hayes, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alicia Hayes

Hello, Jillsargeant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alicia Hayes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]