User talk:Jntnrydg
May 2018
[edit]Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to DYCU, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:33, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]
|
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to DYCU. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 05:56, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
References
[edit]Per wp:verifiability, any significant content needs to wp:cite a wp:reliable source. See wp:referencing for beginners and help:footnotes Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 06:37, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
DYCU
[edit]That was according to their electronics engineer Jntnrydg (talk) 11:52, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DWLW is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWLW until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 19:27, 21 April 2019 (UTC)