User talk:JohnCarastratia

June 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Robert Fowler (surgeon, soldier) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Robert Fowler (surgeon, soldier) was changed by JohnCarastratia (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954022 on 2023-06-22T01:55:43+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:55, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Crockett Cup (2023). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Crockett Cup (2023) was changed by JohnCarastratia (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.945677 on 2023-06-22T02:03:24+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kieren Briggs moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kieren Briggs. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it does not comply with Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 21:57, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kieren Briggs has been accepted

Kieren Briggs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The-Pope (talk) 16:31, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I'm Frood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to André Onana—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – Frood (talk) 01:41, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

cheers frood mate love the name JohnCarastratia (talk) 01:42, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mohamed Kanno. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 01:43, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JohnCarastratia. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JohnCarastratia. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=JohnCarastratia|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. – Frood (talk) 01:58, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Your edit to Cole Palmer has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Peter Katsambanis have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Peter Katsambanis was changed by JohnCarastratia (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890841 on 2024-06-01T01:51:28+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Peter Katsambanis. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Peter Katsambanis. Lynch44 (talk) 02:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 00:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]