User talk:Johnadkison

Welcome!

Hello Johnadkison! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 04:03, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

October 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Circumcision controversies has been reverted.
Your edit here to Circumcision controversies was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.savingsons.org/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:03, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Johnadkison, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Johnadkison! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clitorophallus (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RegistryKey was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clitorophallus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Clitorophallus, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RegistryKey^(RegEdit) 23:44, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clitorophallus (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QueerEcofeminist was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please provide more context to this term, I am sure there is more scientific evidence available about the use of this term and its conceptual scope. thanks

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clitorophallus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Clitorophallus, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 14:50, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Hello, I am writing to you in the spirit that, I want to convey that, am really happy with the fact, you are contributing towards scientific concepts around Queer life. I would be really happy to help you. You can ping me on my talkpage. thanks

QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 14:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clitorophallus (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It may seem weird to say that a draft is "improperly sourced" when there are 17 scholarly sources. The problem is not the number of sources as such, but whether all of them are directly relevant, and how they are cited in the draft.

To begin with, an article has to start with an introduction that, per Wikipedia's Manual of Style, should "identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points". This draft starts with a direct quote from one of the sources, which is not integrated in the text (in itself a problem), and which does none of the four things mentioned in the MoS quote above. A reader who does not already know what a clitorophallus is will not be much wiser after reading that introductory sentence. After the sentence are four footnotes, one referring to the source where the quote was taken from (which does introduce the term in a helpful way), while the other three don't seem to verify this specific piece of information.

The rest of the text in the draft suffers from much the same thing – a lack of context for the reader, and a lot of quality references that don't obviously serve to verify the information in the text.

To improve this draft to where it could work as an article, please remove all direct quotes and present the information in your own words; develop the context to make it clear what the topic actually is (right now it's not clear if the topic is the term itself or the body part the term refers to); remove any sources that are not used to support the information, perhaps listing them in a "Further reading" section.

Please also edit the references to remove all direct links to a specific search result in Google Books (in fact, remove the url entirely if a book has an ISBN), check the bibliographic information, and add important information such as page numbers.

For instance,
Encyclopedia of Endocrine Diseases. Academic Press. 2018-09-12. ISBN 978-0-12-812200-6.
should be
Meyer-Bahlburg, Heino FL (2019). "Intersexuality: Gender assignment and social care". In Huhtaniemi, Ilmo (ed.). Encyclopedia of Endocrine Diseases. Vol. 5: Pediatric Endocrinology (2nd ed.). Academic Publishers. p. 578. ISBN 978-0-12-812200-6.

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clitorophallus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 15:48, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clitorophallus has been accepted

Clitorophallus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]