User talk:JohnnyBravoToons

Welcome![edit]

Hello, JohnnyBravoToons, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to List of The Powerpuff Girls episodes. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 12:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain[edit]

Do you have any evidence to support the fact that The Jungle Book was supposedly written specifically for adults? What was the reasoning behind your edit? I also want to let you know I reverted your edit to The Jungle Book (1967 film) because you go off about how "it's for adults" again, in addition to replacing The Jungle Book 2, which had an actual theatrical release and made a lot of money at the box office, with a far less notable remake (The Jungle Book: Mowgli's Story) that went straight to video. That didn't seem like an improvement to me. Downwiththesyndrome (talk) 18:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Genre[edit]

Hi there, re: this edit at Matilda (1996 film), please note that genre is subjective, and as such, needs to be sourced. Note also that per MOS:FILM, "the primary genre or sub-genre under which it is verifiably classified" should be included. I'm not sure which part of "fantasy comedy-drama" you considered to be the primary genre, and which you considered to be the sub-genre, but they both look like primary genres to me. We also need to avoid description bloat, so that's another consideration, and another reason why genres should be sourced. At some point it gets silly, ex: "period romantic comedy thriller western". Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:51, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello JohnnyBravoToons, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to The Rescuers has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 03:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to DuckTales. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 20:53, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

Your addition to The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:39, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

JohnnyBravoToons (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17658 was submitted on Mar 01, 2017 19:32:07. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:32, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]