User talk:Jona Lendering~enwiki

Amsterdam

Dear Reisio I see you reverted the translation I changed of the legend of the Amsterdam coat of arms; I do not fully understand why, because the translation that was there, is not the official version that is used by the Amsterdam Municipality; I have asked it over there (cf. this webpage. Cordially Jona

My revert had more to do with the manner of your alteration than the translation you provided. If you look carefully, you will see that the existing format was Motto in Nederlands (Motto in English) — you changed this to Slightly altered motto in English (Motto in English). If you'd merely changed Merciful to Compassionate, I would have left it alone. Sorry for the slow response. ¦ Reisio 19:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrus The Great

Your modification to the Cyrus the Great article, in particular, removing a valid reference is against Wikipedia rules and constitutes vandalism. If you feel that you have valid reasons, please provide references/proof in the discussions page. Mehrshad123 01:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another warning..Please stop Vandalizing Cyrus article.

'Great King' is where the suffix "the great" comes from it is only a question of linguistic differences. If you don't understand that, then you must have Downs Syndrome.

Another case of vandalizm to report against this user. Can a moderator please block this user from editing?

Jona, I insist that you do not know what you are talking about and your comments are crazy and outrageous. What do "Iranian Refugees" as you put it have to do with the Cyrus Cylinder? I think you have other issues that need to be dealt with, but not here. - I will give you a chance to state why this translation (which is available in every history text on the Achaemenid Dynasty and Cyrus the Great) is incorrect. By the way the translation you have provided is only a fragment of the full text and it was part of a school exercise! Please do some research before making anymore changes.Mehrshad123 22:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Read your own user talk for reply.Jona Lendering 23:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrus the Great family tree and article

Hey, Jona. Great work on the Cyrus the Great article recently. I'm glad you turned the Cyrus Cylinder section into something acceptable, I thought that would never happen.

I was hoping you could help me with something. A few months ago, I did a short family tree of the Achaemenid rulers. I came across it today, and decided to move it to its own template (Template:Cyrus-tree and the longer version, Template:Achaemenid-tree) and add it to Cyrus the Great, per the article's last featured article candidacy. Could you look it over and let me know if there's anything wrong with it? Or you could even edit it yourself.

One last thing; we currently have three dates for Cyrus' death in the article. In the introduction paragraph, it says July 529 BC. In the military commander box, it says Autumn 530 BC. And finally, in the "Death" section, it puts it as December 530 BCE. Could you go through and add in the correct date? I personally could not come to an appropriate conclusion regarding this matter, due to the various sources providing different information.

Thanks! ♠ SG →Talk 02:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree about the cylinder. Though, the short paragraph that you have written about Pahlavi and such should suffice in the Cyrus article, as it does briefly explain the situation. We could, however, go into more details in the Cyrus cylinder article about the misuse/mistranslation of the cylinder text. ♠ SG →Talk 18:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jona, yes the link works here and also on a friends so there must a problem down your end somewhere. --Rayis 00:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Nabonidus cylinder sippar bm1 s.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Nabonidus cylinder sippar bm1 s.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrus Cylinder

Hi Jona, about this article I would like to point out a few things:

1- You are conducting your original research and putting it on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:No original research.

-Do it elsewhere.

2- You are claiming your point of view Please see WP:NPOV

-Accept other points of view.

3- You are claiming ownership of the article Please see Wikipedia:Ownership of articles

-Let others edit.

Thanks, --Rayis 17:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"I am sorry, I am not. I have decently put online sources: U.N. letters, ancient cuneiform tablets. What else do you need?"

Original research I was referring to is "proposing theories and solutions, original ideas" (See WP:NOT), there is no source to claim that M. Reza Pahlavi was the first people in the world to claim that Cyrus Cylinder is a charter of human rights. Therefore, that section does not need to start and end by referring to this matter. This is your point of view, it is not a generally accepted idea.

"No, I am not, but as things stand, I am the only one capable of actually reading the text. I am also the only one at present who is quoting recent publications, instead of old texts, based on pre-Schaudig editions. I am not claiming any privilege, but if people bring forward pre-Schaudig information, I feel to remove it."

You may be an expert, but your point of view is one, in over 6 billion humans, and this is Wikipedia "not a place to publish your own thoughts and analyses or to publish new information not heretofore published." WP:NOT

--Rayis 17:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If we both agree on this simple matter, then lets compromise on that the section should not evolve around him (Pahlavi). The second part was your conclusion from Mary Boyce's book, etc - I won't compromise on that. I have that book on Zoroastrianism and there is no way you can conclude from that book that Cyrus would not tolerate other religions! :) --Rayis 18:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sure. I will post on the article's talk page from now. --Rayis 18:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: CAIS

I have received communication form CAIS, and the picture of Darius statue at Susa that you claim is yours, in fact was taken by Iran’s Archaeological Research Centre in 1972. Also, they are saying that you never contacted them regarding any images, and whatever images that they have copied from your website, the attributions were made, according to your copyright policy. However, Karl Ribbentrop asked me that you should check their website and if you see any images were taken from your website, and the appropriate attributions were not made, they either can delete them or acknowledge you as the source. Surena 22:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your Anti-Vandalism Efforts!

I see you've done a great job protecting such pages as Cyrus the Great against damage. Intentional, repeated damage is vandalism, and editors who perform repeated acts of vandalism can only be termed vandals. I hope you're able to join me in tracking the future edits of known, active Wikipedia vandals, and protecting other articles from him/her as well. Bete Noir 19:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture notes

Hi there. A querry. In the livius article 'after alexander' there is a photograph of 3 three flags. The caption (visible on my computer only when the cursor goes over it) reads, 'three flags: Europe, Greece, Macedonia'. As part of an ongoing research, I would be greatful in your interpretation of this title. For my personal details and you can email me following the wiki link on my user page. Thanks Politis 13:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone's been violating your copyright

Thought you might like to know - User:Myrmidon111 has been sections of the Julius Caesar article with chunks copied wholesale from the biography of Caesar at livius.org (all his edits so far have been reverted). --Nicknack009 (talk) 07:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of Image:Ancient warfare cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ancient warfare cover.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:12, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Ancient warfare cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ancient warfare cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrus Cylinder

Would you care to weigh in on the recent changes/versions? Cheers. 3rdAlcove (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very understandable. Thanks for your reply. 3rdAlcove (talk) 19:55, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Opis

Hi Jona. There's a dispute ongoing at Battle of Opis about which translation of the Nabonidus Chronicle should be prioritised - A.K. Grayson's standard text from Assyrian and Babylonian Chronicles or a recently published dissenting view by W.G. Lambert. I noticed that you'd published an older translation (Oppenheim's) on your website. I'm currently trying to get the issue mediated; would you be able to offer advice as an independent outside expert? -- ChrisO (talk) 22:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just following up on this, I've posted a summary of the issue at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-10-06 Battle of Opis#Dispute outline. -- ChrisO (talk) 02:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message; I read your page on the chronicle with interest. You might like to know that I've recently been working on the Nabonidus Chronicle article and I recently had an opportunity to photograph the artifact itself. You're welcome to use the high-res image (File:Nabonidus chronicle.jpg) for your own purposes if you wish. -- ChrisO (talk) 00:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Motya-1.jpg

This image is, as far as I understand it, copyright by you. Since there is a note on your homepage that generally allows such images with limitations, [1] Therefore I have moved the file from the commons to Wikipedia and placed a speedy delete tag on the commons image. There might still be some problems with that from Wikipedia's perspective. For some reason (which is not explained) Wikipedia doesn't want content that can't be used for any purpose, see: Wikipedia:Non-free content. Since you have explicitly disallowed commercial use, that might be a problem. However, with moving the image away from the commons, I should have at least, I hope, taken your concerns into account. Zara1709 (talk) 17:23, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Motya-1.jpg

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Motya-1.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[2][3]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 19:09, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carthage.gif copyright

Hi Jona. Someone uploaded the map of ancient Carthage linked to above, which I believe you made. Unfortunately the copyright statements on livius.org are not compatible with Wikimedia Commons, where that image is hosted; to be compatible with Commons, images must be licensed under a free license. Since you are the copyright holder, could you upload the map of Carthage to Commons under a free license, or send an e-mail (e-mail templates here) to the Open-source Ticket Request System (OTRS), explained here, indicating that you are releasing it under a free license? Otherwise, it will have to be deleted as a copyright violation. If you have any questions let me know! Thank you, - Gump Stump (talk) 01:25, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources on Alexander the Great

in need of attention from an expert :) Catalographer (talk) 07:26, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Jona Lendering! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 828 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

William W. Hallo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ancient warfare cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ancient warfare cover.jpg, which you've sourced to Ancient Warfare. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —innotata 16:35, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Jona Lendering. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Jona Lendering~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

00:56, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

14:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]