User talk:Juanc1317

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Get Sleazy Tour appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 06:46, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

• Edits Like This Are not allowed. The source is unreliable, you cannot speak for "disappointed fans" thats 100% your WP:POV. Do not add anything similar to the article again please. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 06:49, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2011

Your recent edit to the page Party in the U.S.A. appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 18:51, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Glee: The Music, Volume 5, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yves (talk) 16:08, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

List of best-selling music artists

Your edits have once again been reverted. Please refrain from inserting P!nk into the List of best-selling music artists with unreliable sources as you have done in this and this edits. Be informed that all sources at List of best-selling music artists must come either prestigious news services such as CNN, Fox News, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, The New York Times etc., or music industry related establishments such as MTV, VH1. Since you are a new editor, it is highly recommended that you discuss the reliability of your sources at Talk:List of best-selling music artists before editing. --Harout72 (talk) 21:31, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Get Sleazy Tour, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:30, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Get Sleazy Tour, you may be blocked from editing. 'WP:SYNTH; its not part of the tour its just a performance.' - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:41, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Get Sleazy Tour, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:55, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

February 2012

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you did to Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Sc135 (talk) 02:40, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Recent Glee edits

As you have been told several times above, original research is not allowed on Wikipedia. You need to have reliable sources. This is definitely true for your edits on "Big Brother", and similar edits to Glee (season 3) and even the List of songs in Glee (season 3) article.

It may be hard to accept, but listening to YouTubes that are purported to be (and, admittedly, likely to be) songs from the upcoming show seems like an ideal source. It isn't. First, you are listening, you are concluding that the voices you are hearing are Artie's and Quinn's, and therefore you come to the conclusion that Quinn has survived. And you state that. That's the very definition of original research. You need to be able to point to a secondary source that can state from knowledge—not a guess based on something that has been seen or heard in a preview (scenes get cut) or heard (songs get cut)—that something is definitely happening in the episode. Until you have a reliable source citation, which lets out the dozens of fan sites like Wetpaint and the various Glee wikias, the information is simply not acceptable in Wikipedia articles.

This may be hard for you to accept, but those are the rules. Any edits that violate them will be reverted, especially before the episode airs. Once the episode has aired, then what was broadcast becomes the obvious and irrefutable source for the events in it, but even then, it's considered polite to hold off on posting the plot and its inevitable spoilers until the episode has aired on the US west coast. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:58, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Did you even read the PerezHilton article you're citing in your new edits. It says, and I quote, "Sources have also confirmed that Dianna WILL be back on the set in some capacity, but this could be through writing trickery like a dream sequence, a reduced role, maybe even a flashback or a flashforward!" So you cannot cite this article as a source saying Quinn will survive the crash based on it. You just can't. Please, stop trying to put this same information on the page. Believe me, if there were a reliable source that could be used, it would already be there. It isn't.

Further edit attempts that are poorly or deceptively sourced will be considered vandalism, and treated as such. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother (Glee). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You again placed the claim regarding Artie and Quinn in this article, citing YouTube and another Wikipedia article—which you may not have known is against sourcing rules—but which also used YouTube as its source. The claim in List of songs in Glee (season 3) has been removed for the same reason. Wikipedia has these rules about verifiability, original research, and Wikipedia articles referencing other Wikipedia articles for a good reason.

When I started on Wikipedia, I initially had a few times when I was morally certain that something was true, the way you are with Quinn and the wheelchair, and Artie and Quinn and the songs. And my edits were reverted just as yours are being, because I couldn't verify them with reliable sources. And the vast majority of the time I was right ... but more than once I was wrong. Wikipedia isn't about being the first with the news, before all the information is rock solid. It's about waiting until the information is rock solid—there is a reliable source—and only then publishing it. To do otherwise is to take a reliable article and make it less so. Persisting at that is vandalism, as much as adding complete and utter nonsense. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:08, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of songs in Glee (season 3), you may be blocked from editing. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:27, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of songs in Glee (season 3), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 12:40, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

December 2012

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Kelly Clarkson. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:47, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Juanc1317. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Juanc1317. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)