User talk:Karimobo

Edit-warring on Legal status of Western Sahara

Please stop I'm not going to let this go on for long. You need to stop reverting, removing sources, and labeling others' edits as vandalism when they plainly are not. I recommend that you read WP:DISPUTE. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:51, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Koavf, I don't think you're in a position to define what is vandalism and what not. I only reverted edits that are not in line with NPOV, and the article has the problem of being biased towards the Polisario. karimobo (talk) 21:56, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Guys. I've just archived prior discussions. So let's start again. I suggest every single involved editor makes a brief summary of a few lines about h/er concerns. Please avoid responding to eachother for the time being. Any uninvolved editor can participate as well. Thank her disyou. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 19:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, a summary about what?!
About the fact that Western Sahara and the "sahrawi republic" are two distinct thing?
I am honnest, I don't understand this action, especially that the article is looking finer and people are doing effort to edit in a productive/constructive way.
We need rather to look at the problem where it comes from: koavf, known as militant for the independence of Western Sahara from Morocco wants to use of wikipedia to push Polisario POV, insisting on confusing Western Sahara with the "sadr".
This behaviour had costed him to be baned/blocked from wikipedia on indefinite.
And now that he is unblocked, even if he is on parole, he violated the rules again, just to furiousely fight for the same ideology and POV.
Koavf is only looking for mediation because he can revert only one time/day.
You can mediate as you can, as long as koavf edits in Western Sahara, he will edit-war every single change that does not fit Polisario's view.
This is the problem.
Honnestly I don't know why you don't see it and why you unblocked him.
It's that easy: when he is away there is peace. When he is back there is war.

wikima 19:26, 18 July 2007 (UTC)"[reply]

Economy of Morocco

Your addition to Economy of Morocco has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. [1]

I don't know you've made similar edits or not. At this point I'm only concerned that this edit is similar to some spamming that's been reported here. --Ronz (talk) 20:24, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thomaswhite.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://www.thomaswhite.com --Ronz (talk) 23:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Morocco-HasanI.jpg

The file File:Morocco-HasanI.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Updating File:MoroccoSaharaIssue.png

Hi Karimobo, I saw that this file has not been updated since 2020. In the meantime there have been new developments, with additional countries supporting Morocco's autonomy plan, among which Mauritania and Mexico. Would be great if you could update this file. Stoepkrijtske (talk) 12:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Moroccans1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Moroccans1.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:43, 29 July 2022 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:43, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]