User talk:Khatridaniyal

May 2023

Hello, I'm Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Review have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 10:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1) Hyperlinks are not allowed in the text of articles. 2) The disambigulation section at the beginning of some articles is not a place for content. David notMD (talk) 12:39, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, hyperlinks not allowed in the text. Can be converted to references if that is appropriate, or at the end in an External links section. Also, expressing your own opinions (Tehnology review) does not belong in an article. David notMD (talk) 18:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Vandalism like what you did to Mirror in the Bathroom will get your account indefinitely blocked. Also, Edit summaries should describe what you did, not obfuscate. David notMD (talk) 04:33, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1][2] MrOllie (talk) 20:24, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Adding elegantshowers to articles is spamming. Stop or you will be blocked. David notMD (talk) 10:49, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Air charter. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. - Ahunt (talk) 12:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did as a reference at Modest fashion. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. David notMD (talk) 08:20, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, your attempt to create an article about Elegant Showers will fail unless there are independent refs about the company. See WP:NCORP for corporate notability. David notMD (talk) 08:23, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:17, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #75659

is closed -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]