User talk:Kinfoll1993

Hi, all. Recently, I was blocked under username NonServiam666. I don't understand the reason for this blockage. I was simply trying to edit the Irish diaspora page. The reason given was vandalism and block evasion, but I have not been vandalizing or evading blocks. I simply want to edit the article. Although I didn't provide citations last time, I can provide citations this time (if that was the problem). I am not trying to vandalize or engender any harm. I just want to contribute to Wikipedia and help with articles. Thanks, Kinfoll77Kinfoll77 (talk) 02:16, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

There is no account called NonServiam666, but there is Nonserviam666, which has once edited the article Irish diaspora, so that must be the account you mean. However, that account is not blocked, and never has been. Assuming that you have not had some other account which has been blocked, my guess is that you have been subject to a block affecting your IP address. That could be either a direct block on your IP address, or an autoblock caused by your IP address very recently being used by the user of another account which has been blocked. Since you posted to my talk page about this, I assume that you saw my name in the block message you saw, but I have searched through all the blocks I have placed over the last couple of months, and can't find one that fits the information you give. Are you sure that the block affected the account Nonserviam666, not just an attempt to edit without logging into any account? If it only affected you when you were not logged in, then there is no problem as long as you do log in. If it really does affect you when you are logged in to either that account or this one, then let me know exactly what the message you see when you try to edit says, including any IP address it gives, or the name of any other account it mentions, and I can try to sort it out for you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 07:51, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  Ok, I'm not exactly sure about NonServiam666, I thought I created that account, but when I tried to log in with that it won't come up. I'm just going to use this accountKinfoll77 (talk) 19:18, 20 June 2014 (UTC), from now on. I will let you know if I have any more problems. Thank you for taking the time to help. Sincerely, Kinfoll77 (talk) 19:18, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Irish diaspora may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Americans-tracing-IRISH-roots-inspired-Barack-Obama.html|access date=20 June 2014}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Wiethoff|first=William E.|title=Crafting the Overseer's Image|publisher=University

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:23, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kinfoll1993. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, Kinfoll1993. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 01:33, 2 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dandy (Space Dandy) (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ThaddeusB was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dandy (Space Dandy) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ThaddeusB (talk) 21:43, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kinfoll1993, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ThaddeusB (talk) 21:43, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kinfoll1993. You have new messages at ThaddeusB's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Repost of Pinky (Adult Entertainer)

A tag has been placed on Pinky (Adult Entertainer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kinfoll1993. You have new messages at Gene93k's talk page.
Message added 01:41, 29 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited August Ames, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Empire characters

I saw your article that is waiting for review for the Lucious Lyon character. With your permission, I'd like to start contribute to it, if that's ok with you. I've actually been working on articles for all of the main characters on Empire. However, I wasn't exactly sure if it would have been too soon start putting out articles. Here is what I have so far, however Lucious is probably the least developed piece. You can respond to me on my own talk page.

--Nk3play2 ^{my buzz} 16:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hakeem Lyon storyline section?

Hey I just built an article for Hakeem Lyon. I don't have the time to do a storyline section right now. You can do it if you want.--Nk3play2 ^{my buzz} 22:06, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks. I'll do it. I don't have anything for Hakeem now, but I'll put something together before the end of tonight. Kinfoll1993 (talk) 22:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes from other actors

Also, I have some concern with the Cookie Lyon and Jamal Lyon article, as there were quotes from other actors. We came to an agreement that there should not be quotes from actors who did not portray the character that the article is about, but there are quotes from Smollett in Cookie's article and quotes from Howard in Jamal's article. There needs to be consistency in regards to that; i.e. if the Jamal article can only be from Smollet/Jamal's perspective, then the same should apply to the Lucious article and Cookie article. Another option would be to keep the quotes from the other actors in the Jamal and Cookie article, but allow back the quotes from Henson and Smollett for the Lucious article. I mention this on the Cookie Talk section. Kinfoll1993 (talk) 22:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lucious Lyon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter White. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of fictional antiheroes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Walking Dead. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Development section?

I noticed you putting the casting and creation sections for the Empire characters in their own section. I initially put it under the development heading BECAUSE the casting and the creation of a character is a major part the character's development. I plan to put the sections back under the development heading. Just wanted to give you a heads up.--Nk3play2 ^{my buzz} 17:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Lucious Lyon talk page. I disagree and maintain that they are NOT a major part of the character's development section, nor a part of development at all. They are an utterly SEPARATE entity. Kinfoll1993 (talk) 20:30, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Empire character pages

Hi Kinfoll1993. I'm sorry I didn't get back to you sooner, but I read the discussion at Talk:Lucious Lyon and I think Flyer22 has some good suggestions. I don't have any real experience with articles related to fictional characters, so I'm not sure there's much I can add. Thank you, — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:36, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

African American commercial testing companies

Hi, Middayexpress. When editing the African American page, I didn't mean to place unreliable information down. I was simply unaware that commercial testing companies were not reliable, as I had always thought information from 23andme and Ancestry.com would be fine to use as references. I viewed Malik Shabazz's page because I got a new message from him concerning an article about Lucious Lyon which I created and am responding to that, and noticed your message there about me adding commercial firms. We resolved this on the talk page. You don't have to worry about me adding any information from commercial firms. I know better now, and when I add further information, it will be from non-profit research such as the latest information I added from the Oxford University study. If you wanted me to not do so, you could have told me on my talk page-we would have worked it out. I understand and I'm not trying to sabotage the page, I was only adding information I thought would help the article. I guarantee you this issue won't come up again, at least not from me. Kinfoll1993 (talk) 20:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kinfoll1993. I'm not sure I follow. I believe we already did discuss this on the talk page and reached an agreement after I explained to you the WP:MEDRS policy. Malik Shabazz noted as much there as well. At any rate, in future, please first discuss any major changes on the talk page for consensus per WP:BRD. Thanks, Middayexpress (talk) 21:24, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I checked the date/time of the message you sent Malik, I thought the message was sent after we went to the talk page, but it was sent before. My mistake. I'll be sure to take it to the talk page from now on per BRD. Kinfoll1993 (talk) 21:31, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kinfoll1993. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 21:51, 9 April 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Re: Empire character article format

First, I'd like to apologize if I offended you during our last exchange. And you're right, I did the same thing I accused you of doing. I hope we can move forward and work together on this without too much conflict. Secondly, sorry it has taken me so long to respond, I've had some things come up. However, I'm back and ready to work. I've created a sandbox of the potential article format here taking into account some of your suggestions and some of my own. Tell me what you think on my talk page.--Nk3play2 ^{my buzz} 20:16, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The "characterization or personality" was actually so we could make a decision on which one we wanted to use for the articles. --Nk3play2 ^{my buzz} 20:44, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, well I'd prefer personality, as seen in the Manning article. The two are interchangeable, I remember earlier in the discussions on the talk page I had preferred personality, and you had preferred characterization. Do you still prefer characterization? Kinfoll1993 (talk) 20:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Personality is just fine. I'll start implementing the changes.--Nk3play2 ^{my buzz} 22:42, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok after further review, and actually seeing the format used in the Lucious article, I've come up with a slightly altered version. I've done away with the word "portrayal" in the casting section. It seems you were right when you said portrayal and characterization were interchangeable. And as for "Characterization" over "Personality," I did that specifically for the character of Cookie because the "Fashion" section would be included in that section. I think "Characterization" can cover a much broader spectrum of the character's personality. HERE IT IS.--Nk3play2 ^{my buzz} 23:41, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The set up looks good, but I think that Creation would still go better with Development rather than Casting. I think it is a good idea to keep Creation and Development together b/c it is a middle ground of sorts-since I had maintained that Creation wasn't a part of Development and you had maintained it was. With the two put together that issue is resolved. Kinfoll1993 (talk) 04:51, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited African American, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of fictional antiheroes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Wright. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dandy (Space Dandy) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dandy (Space Dandy), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dandy (Space Dandy)

Hello, Kinfoll1993. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Dandy".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Dandy (Space Dandy)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:49, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Imperator Furiosa a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Please don't do this sort of thing again. DES ^(talk) 20:56, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kinfoll1993. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of August Ames for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article August Ames is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/August Ames until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kinfoll1993. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]