User talk:Kmayasmith123

This is Kmayasmith123's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kabuki Akiyama Z (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kabuki Akiyama Z and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 03:01, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kmayasmith123, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 03:01, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spruce & Gimli

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Spruce & Gimli, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:26, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gimli Wilds

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Gimli Wilds, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spruce Wilds

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Spruce Wilds, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax content

Hi there, please stop submitting articles about imaginary topics at Wikipedia. If you want to let loose your imagination and write about subjects that you've created, there are other places for that, like blogs and personal webpages and whatnot. Wikipedia only cares about subjects that are notable, and non-existent projects don't fulfill our needs. You are welcome to edit at Wikipedia, but please make sure your edits contribute to the project. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:17, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Floyd and Niko

Hello, Kmayasmith123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Floyd and Niko".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:24, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mega Cosmetic Maia: Intergalactic Sorceress

Hello, Kmayasmith123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mega Cosmetic Maia: Intergalactic Sorceress".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 18:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

re. your PRODs for your drafts

Hey, I've noticed you placing a PROD ('proposed deletion' template) on your drafts, and restoring them after they were removed. PROD isn't meant to be used on drafts -- it's only for pages in mainspace, the part of Wikipedia with non-draft articles (and a couple other places, but those aren't relevant to this). The reasons you've been giving for prodding them also suggest you don't actually want them to be deleted. If you delete an article, it's gone forever unless you make a special request or have the text emailed to you. It's okay for a draft to sit around for a long time when it isn't ready yet -- that's the point of drafts! If they don't get any edits for a long time, they'll be deleted anyway from something called WP:G13. Drafts aren't supposed to be ready yet, so the articles don't have to be deleted, and if you do delete them they won't be there when they are ready. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 19:28, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]