User talk:Krakennowak

This is Krakennowak's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of O Walzer fuer die Luftwaffe characters (April 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbrks was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

tvtropes is not a reliable source. Also, see WP:NLIST.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of O Walzer fuer die Luftwaffe characters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of O Walzer fuer die Luftwaffe characters, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Pbrks ^(t • c) 05:40, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Krakennowak! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – Pbrks ^(t • c) 05:40, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of O Walzer Fuer Die Luftwaffe Characters for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of O Walzer Fuer Die Luftwaffe Characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of O Walzer Fuer Die Luftwaffe Characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place for your personal projects[edit]

“Alternative comics” you dreamed up that haven’t even been published, let alone reviewed, are exactly what Wikipedia:NOTMADEUP is referring to. Wikipedia is not a Wikipedia:WEBHOST for your vanity projects. Dronebogus (talk) 05:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kepler Microcinema[edit]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Kepler Microcinema, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dronebogus (talk) 05:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:List of Gumshoe Characters[edit]

Draft:List of Gumshoe Characters, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:List of Gumshoe Characters and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:List of Gumshoe Characters during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dronebogus (talk) 05:10, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Writing advice[edit]

”Gumshoe” is a generic title, you won’t get any search hits with that
Using a foreign language for your title can come across as pretentious
Wikipedia and TVTropes are great sources for research but please do not use them for spam.

Dronebogus (talk) 05:19, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Dronebogus,

Go ahead and have the drafts deleted. I'm alright maintaining that information on a Google Doc instead. And thanks for the advice. I was actually considering changing those names beforehand but nothing has been coming to mind. I agree that Gumshoe is both too generic and also not really emblematic of what it is now. Anyways, I understand the situation and concur with the necessary deletions. Krakennowak (talk) 05:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]