User talk:Krish512

Welcome!

Hello, Krish512, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Beeblebrox (talk) 20:12, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, if you make just two more edits you will be automatically confirmed, but I would advise you to review our guidelines on conflicts of interest. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:13, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ForGetting The Unforgettable

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ForGetting The Unforgettable, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uNI4rGfImw.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 18:48, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ForGetting The Unforgettable for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ForGetting The Unforgettable is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ForGetting The Unforgettable until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:44, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notability for books and whatnot

Hey, I saw where you're adding a lot of articles to the mainspace. I thought I'd explain a little about notability, especially for books.

The first thing is that selling a lot of copies doesn't give notability. It would be nice if it was as easy as that, but selling a lot doesn't give notability. That's why we often have books that will move to the top of one of the New York Times Bestseller lists, yet never gain enough coverage to merit an article. It's very frustrating, to say the least. Selling well may make it more likely that the book will gain coverage, but it's never a guarantee. Also, notability is not inherited (WP:NOTINHERITED) by the fact that a notable person wrote it. Like bestselling status, this can make it more likely a book will gain coverage but also isn't a guarantee.

Now as far as coverage goes, we're fairly specific in what it can be. Reliable sources (WP:RS) are things such as articles in newspapers, reviews on trusted websites (SF Site for science fiction books, for example), and coverage in news shows. Things that can't be used as sources are things like review sites like Goodreads, blogs, and merchant sites. These are usually because they are either average people or because they benefit from the product selling well in some in some form or fashion. Blogs sometimes can be reliable sources, but it's very rare. This is usually when the person writing it is considered to be so notable that they'd be considered reliable because of it. Even then in many cases we have to be able to show that they have some form of an editorial staff that overlooks the blog. Like I said, it's very tricky.

I also noticed that sometimes you have a problem with promotional tones. This can be a difficult thing to overcome when you first start editing on Wikipedia. It's one of the things that I had the biggest problem with when I first started editing and one that I still have problems with. You have to write things in a neutral manner (WP:NPOV) and in a tone that would be encyclopedic. The other big issue is that you had some copyright violations with your text. (WP:COPYVIO) This was because you took the synopsis from the book jacket, most likely. Even though it might seem like it could be easier to just take the book jacket text, you have to re-write it in your own words. There are multiple reasons for this, such as the publisher trying to sue us because we copied it from their synopsis. There are other reasons for this, but this is one example of many.

I hope some of this helps explain why the articles are getting deleted. On a side note, please don't remove AfD templates from the pages. That doesn't stop the AfDs and is seen as vandalizing the article. The only template that you would be able to remove and contest a deletion would be a WP:PROD template. For AfDs the only way you can contest the deletion is to talk on the applicable AfD talk page. Hope this helps! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:46, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also wanted to say that we can't add things just to give them coverage and notice. It might seem like it would be WP:USEFUL to have the information on here, but in the end we can't add it unless it already passes notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:48, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Forgetting the Unforgettable to be allowed

The synopsis content of the page is the synopsis of the book and can be copied from any source as it does not have any copy right issues. There has been a major mistake in considering this page for deletion. The page mentions all legitimate details with proper content without any copyright issues. Try reconsidering every thought for deletion of this page.

The discussion that led to the deletion is here. No one said anything about copyright issues. The focus was on the book itself having the notability needed to have its own article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:19, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Abhishek Agrawal.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Abhishek Agrawal.jpg, which you've attributed to Jimmy Eric. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:00, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Abhishek Agrawal. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. You only seem to be here to promote Abhishek Agrawal. Please read through the linked guidelines paying special attention to the sections related to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 20:26, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 07:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abhishek Agrawal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abhishek Agrawal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Agrawal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DreamGuy (talk) 00:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Abhishek Aggrawal. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -©2015 Compassionate727^{(Talk)(Contributions)} 13:45, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 21:25, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]