User talk:Kristina2477

Image tagging for Image:Grammys07arrival1171242oj2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Grammys07arrival1171242oj2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wgram2110703xs4.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wgram2110703xs4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CyberGhostface 20:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Beyonce0101.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Beyonce0101.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kate_moss.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kate_moss.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Katewinslet01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Katewinslet01.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSCF0494.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSCF0494.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 14:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christina Aguilera

The image for the infobox has been discussed on Talk:Christina Aguilera#Image. Discuss there instead of continuing to revert with no consensus. Revert again and you will be blocked. Ward3001 (talk) 15:42, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Christina Aguilera has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Kbdank71 15:43, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Christina Aguilera. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Ward3001 (talk) 15:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Kristina2477 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Sef aguilera (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
ItsZae (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Gjuteriet00 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

If you are adding unacceptable images, edit warring, and vandalizing using these different usernames, it is considered sockpuppetry, a very egregious policy violation on Wikipedia. Wikipedia has the capability for determining whether you are doing this. Not only can you be blocked for sockpuppetry, you can be permanantly banned from Wikipedia. If you continue your disruptive editing, there will be a sockpuppet investigation. This is your only warning. Ward3001 (talk) 15:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

we're not the same person. The three usernames have identical problem edits, and have almost exclusively edited Christina Aguilera articles. That is always considered suspicious on Wikipedia, and is grounds for an investigation.

I will find a free close-up photograph of Christina Aguilera: Don't bother. The photograph currently in the infobox is perfectly acceptable and known to be free. You are finding copyrighted images and calling them free. Whether you say it's free or not, you must obtain consensus to change the image. There is already a discussion on the talk page. Change the image without consensus and you will be blocked. Ward3001 (talk) 16:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We're editing the same page because we know each other: A frequently-used story by sockpuppets. That does not stop an investigation or stop the blocks if sockpuppetry is verified (which is easy to do).
The picture I have uploaded is free as it is a personal shot: A lie and further grounds for a sockpuppetry investigation. You said you would "find" a close-up, which is what you have done. You "find" copyrighted images from websites and say they're free. All three usernames have repeatedly committed this serious policy violation. Your assumption that the rest of us are too stupid to figure that out is a bad one. It's easy to find the very same images that you find, and when that is done, you are then blocked for copyright violation. You apparently do not realize how seriously Wikipedia takes copyright violations. It is against the law and opens Wikipedia up to lawsuit. There are thousands of editors who do nothing but look for the same kind of copyright violations that you have commmitted. Note that two administrators, who can block you immediately, have become involved in this issue.
Where do we get consensus?: As you have been told repeatedly, you discuss on Talk:Christina Aguilera#Image, let others express their opinions, and then wait to see if the weight of opinions favors a change. And be prepared to defend how you obtained an image and provided evidence that it is free.
This is the end of my discussion here. If you have further comments make them on the appropriate talk page. And remember you have been warned, so commit a policy violation and you will be blocked without further notice. Ward3001 (talk) 16:20, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

if you continue to threaten me, I will report you: Warnings are neither threats nor policy violations. Making false reports, on the other hand, is a policy violation. Warnings are done to protect Wikipedia and prevent you from getting into deeper trouble than you already are in. Report all you want. It only makes a better case against you. End of discussion. Ward3001 (talk) 16:35, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:31, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Xtina zae.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Xtina zae.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --J Milburn (talk) 09:53, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]