User talk:Largopajero

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Largopajero, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 08:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Uruguay national football team worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Bocafan76 (talk) 17:16, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Uruguay national football team, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bocafan76 (talk) 20:47, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the tables that you have added to the Uruguay national football team are not standard or agree upon by consensus to be used in National football team articles, if you don't like the current standard you are welcome to open a discussion about changing it on WT:FOOTY. Regards --Bocafan76 (talk) 20:51, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The table of the squad of Uruguay national football team that I made, is the same as the Slovakia national football team, this contain more information about the team.

Hi again, just finished fixing the Slovakia national football team, so the article is up to standard, the information about the footballers debut with their corresponding national team, should be added the the players article and not to the national team article. Regards --Bocafan76 (talk) 22:12, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi once more, the template that you removed from the Uruguay national football team article was added for a reason. If you look at the discussion page of the article, you will realize that the reason was that the stats are wrong and that's why the template was added, please don't remove the template unless all of the stats are correct. Regards --Bocafan76 (talk) 21:27, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Greetings,

Many of your edits have been reverted for a number of reasons. 1) This was reverted because multiple qualification is handled differently. Look at examples of multiple qualification here, here, and here. 2) This was reverted because Penarol is qualified to the 2012 Copa Libertadores. Their berth may change if they win the 2011 edition, but regardless they are still in. 3) This was reverted for a) the same reason as #1, and b) because the positions by round has no source and is considered original research, which is not allowed. 4) This was reverted because titles are not given for winning the Apertura and Clausura in the same was they do in Argentina and the likes, and because when you win the season in Uruguay, you are considered the champion. Lastly, 5) this was reverted because those parameters are unnecessary when the season is over, or those parameters don't apply. Nacional isn't the champion because of the aggregate table, but because of a playoff. It is misleading to mention that in the aggregate.

Aside from that you do good when it comes to Uruguayan football. But if you to do disruptive reverts like this, I will have to take action against it. Thanks in advance. Digirami (talk) 21:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1) Look the example of Premier League. 2) If Fénix or Bella Vista wins the 2011 Copa Sudamericana will earn the Uruguay 3 berth for 2012 Copa Libertadores, see here. 3) This is the same reason as #1, the results by round I do it when the tournament advances in the history of the article you can see the positions of the team at weeks indicated. 4) In Uruguay the Apertura's winners and the Clausura's winners earn a trophy and qualify for the chanpionship play-offs, for the AUF there are official tournaments.

1) My examples have been around for much longer. There is a special template just for such situations. 2) As of now, Penarol is in. Of course, that may change. But in the meantime, it needs to reflect the present. 3) Once it's finished, that parameter is not needed; you'll end up with two things doing the same thing and the "qualification" column does a much better job at it. 2) Find me the titles in this list. Those are the only titles that matter. Digirami (talk) 23:17, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1) The article of Premier League is the most complete, it's an example for other competitions. 2) If Peñarol is in the 2012 Copa Libertadores, Fénix is in the 2011 Copa Sudamericana but the article don't include that team in the international qualification. 4) The rules of the tournament state that there are a champion of Apertura and Clausura, see here, here, and here

1) "Completeless" is a lame argument. Fact is, those articles use it more frequently and in more articles. Go check. 2) That's if. But for now, they are in. 4) Even so, no club season article in wiki specifies how many titles they have won in the infoboxes of club season article; just position. Not a single one. It's not convention. 6) Plus, it's spelled "title", not "tittle". Digirami (talk) 02:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2) Fénix is in also but don't appears in the international qualifications. If Fénix or Bella Vista wins the 2011 Copa Sudamerican Peñarol don't qualifiy for the 2012 Copa Libertadores, there isn't in. If Peñarol is in the 2012 Copa Libertadores, Fénix is in in the 2011 Copa Sudamericana, but Fénix don't appears in the international qualifications. 7) The manager's nationality can be appeared, see here, here and here.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Earth, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of Nicolás Prieto

The article Nicolás Prieto has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gurt Posh (talk) 01:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added source.

Proposed deletion of Federico Martín Rodríguez

The article Federico Martín Rodríguez has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Transity^{(talk • contribs)} 03:09, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added source.

Proposed deletion of Camilo Mayada

The article Camilo Mayada has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 12:09, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 Club Nacional de Football season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pablo Álvarez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 Club Nacional de Football season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fernando Cabrera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 in Uruguayan football, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maldonado (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:30, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Largopajero. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Largopajero. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2025 FIFA Club World Cup qualifying for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 FIFA Club World Cup qualifying is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 FIFA Club World Cup qualifying until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chris1834 Talk 13:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South American Women's Basketball League, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Central University, Vélez Sarsfield and Paola Ferrari. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]