User talk:Lauren maggio

Welcome!

Hello, Lauren maggio, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 16:19, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome

Look forwards to working together. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 07:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the hepatitis reference. I'll look at Schiff's. I've been looking for freely available review articles to use as my primary sources but imagine a more comprehensive text might also be helpful. Emhawkins (talk) 18:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re: Potential useful information resources

Hi Lauren! I was thinking about fiction and non-fiction books where depression is the main subject or theme (ex. The Noonday Demon by Andrew Solomon). Given the bit of controversy around adding another section to an article that is already high quality, I will make that my second project, after editing and revamping the white blood cell article. Thank you for the advice about resources to check out! LaurenSMS4 (talk) 16:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perspectives on Medical Education (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please provide independent references citing the extent to which papers in the journal are referenced by other scholars.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Perspectives on Medical Education and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Perspectives on Medical Education, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:07, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lauren maggio! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:07, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Courses Modules are being deprecated

Hello,

Your account is currently configured with an education program flag. This system (the Courses system) is being deprecated. As such, your account will soon be updated to remove these no longer supported flags. For details on the changes, and how to migrate to using the replacement system (the Programs and Events Dashboard) please see Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 18#NOTICE: EducationProgram extension is being deprecated.

Thank you! Sent by: xaosflux 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perspectives on Medical Education has been accepted

Perspectives on Medical Education, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 19:45, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:OABOT#Automate PubMedCentral

Should we add 11,500 links to PubMedCentral in existing (paywalled) citations? I think you may be interested because you helped with OAbot in the past. I've already linked the discussion from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine#11k open access articles to be linked, please help make sure that it's clear enough and that it's notified in the relevant places. Thanks, Nemo 07:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up

Hello Lauren! i just wanted to follow up on the project you are working on and was wondering if perhaps i can share what we want to accomplish at the foundation in regards to data and information we have on research. I spoke to several people already and just wanted to touch base with as many knowledgeable people in the wiki community as i can. please feel free to email me at your convenience dpena@rwjf.org. thank you and i hope to hear from you soon DaP87 (talk) 13:19, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lauren maggio. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OABOT updates

Hello! Thanks for your past edits using the OAbot tool. I just wanted to let you know that I updated the queue of suggestions, so you should now be able to find more interesting and easy edits to make with it. Best, Nemo 17:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]