User talk:Laurence Drum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Laurence Drum, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

The Wikipedia Adventure guide

Hi Laurence Drum!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:36, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NetDev Ltd (March 7)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Teahouse logo
Hello! Laurence Drum, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

NetDev Ltd Article for Creation[edit]

Hi Laurence, firstly sorry about the red links, we use a helpful script to review articles, allowing us to do it far quicker than we could manually, and for some reason when it was converting your URLs to wikilinks it messed up the formatting and broke them all, I've just fixed that for you, sorry about that. In the future you can link directly to other Wikipedia articles using square brackets, no need to use the whole web address, like so: [[Earth]] giving Earth or if you wanted the text to say something other than the article name, [[Earth|Our planet]] giving Our planet. As for the article itself, Wikipedia requires that you source your information to reliable independent sources to prove that the information is true and the subject is notable. These sources must be reliable ones with a reputation for fact checking (news websites, newspapers, published books, scientific papers, etc) and not be related to or written by the subject (that means no Press Releases, not their own website, and not written by anyone who works for them). You cite these sources using the method described at WP:REFBEGIN. Hope this helps, Samwalton9 (talk) 12:39, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Sam, not a problem. I have added a some references to the article. However, how is the best way to add them to the reference list at the bottom? Thanks for your help. Laurence Laurence Drum (talk) 17:15, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Excellent. The references auto-populate in the {{reflist}} template I've just added at the bottom. Samwalton9 (talk) 17:28, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Fantastic! Thank you for doing that. Do you think I could resubmit the article now and it will be approved? Laurence Laurence Drum (talk) 15:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
I think you could do with better reliable sources. Two of them only mention the company in passing, not really containing much information about them, and the other is an interview; essentially a primary source. Samwalton9 (talk) 15:47, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback Unfortunately they have now decided to delete the page? Is there a way of getting it back? Laurence Drum (talk) 12:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Hmm, I noticed. I should have checked whether the article was a copyright violation when I was looking at it before, sorry for not doing so, would have saved us both some time. As written below, all text on Wikipedia is released under a creative commons license, but if the text being used is copied from somewhere that has not been released under such a licence the text has to be immediately removed. This applies to anywhere on the site and as such you won't be able to get a copy of the writing. Samwalton9 (talk) 13:43, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Sam, I have taken the feedback on board and started developing the article once more. I am currently in the process of polishing it up. However I would really appreciate your feedback on it? Laurence Drum (talk) 17:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Hi again Laurence. You've started writing the article but haven't shown where any of the information is sourced from; we currently have no proof that any of it is true! My advice to you is to find reliable sources talking about the company (if they exist), and write what they have to say, rather than the other way around. It will help you realise if the company isn't a good topic for Wikipedia, because you won't be able to find any information, or if they are notable, to be able to write a great article that will be accepted easily. Taking it to one extreme, an article with single sentences stating assorted well sourced facts about a subject is preferable to one that has loads of content and very little sourcing. We at least know everything said in the former is true. Samwalton9 (talk) 17:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Sam, apologies, I am going to work the citations in just didn't want to spend that extra time putting them in if the article won't suffice to get published.

Copyright violation in Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NetDev Ltd[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NetDev Ltd, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License." You may also e-mail or mail the Foundation to release the content. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more.

While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:15, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, How do I go about getting this page back so that I can make the changes.

Thanks Laurence Laurence Drum (talk) 13:34, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NetDev Ltd concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NetDev Ltd, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NetDev Ltd[edit]

Hello Laurence Drum. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "NetDev Ltd".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NetDev Ltd}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

September 2015[edit]

Information icon Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. If you want to add Drum to List of video telecommunication services and product brands, please write the article first. Please note that new articles must satisfy the notability guideline and core content policies. Thank you. Dodi 8238 (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2015 (UTC)