User talk:LeonardoCiampa

Welcome!

Hello, LeonardoCiampa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Hyacinth (talk) 18:27, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vladimir Horowitz

I have, once again, reverted your edits to this page. No one has claimed, nor did the article state, that Horowitz sought electroshock therapy to alter his sexual orientation. His two rounds of electroshock (in the early 1960s and early 1970s), were for depression. However, both Janis and Plaskin (despite your low opinion of it as a resource) confirm that Horowitz's treatment in the 1940s (which was not electroshock, but analysis) was for his homosexuality. Schonberg also aknowledged Horowitz's homosexuality. Or do you find Schonberg's statement, "Horowitz preferred men" to be ambiguous? Multiple sources back this up, and no credible sources have refuted that. (No, Horowitz's denial of homosexuality is not a credible source, any more than Liberace's denial was.)THD3 (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The only problem is that no one individual editor owns an article on Wikipedia. The history on the Vladimir Horowitz article demonstrates dozens, probably hundreds, of instances of you reverting the edits of others whose views don't happen to agree with yours. As someone with 5,000+ edits, you I'm sure know that this is against Wiki policy. Also: to quote a source with ref tags is not enough when said source is unfounded. Plaskin had no basis for his claims. Yet you immediately revert the edits of any Wiki contributor who points that out. You are not the owner of the Vladimir Horowitz article. I will repeat what many of us have been trying to tell you: Plaskin's comments are unfounded hearsay. You choose to staunchly believe the hearsay -- that is your feeling. But this feeling does not enhance this article or Wiki in general. LeonardoCiampa (talk) 02:10, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What specifically is your issue with the paragraph in question? The assertion that Horowitz was a closeted homosexual, or that he sought psychoanalysis to change it? Do you consider Schonberg and Janis to be hearsay?THD3 (talk) 13:05, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The question, instead, is: why are you so staunchly trying to hold up the hearsay? Plaskin prints a rumor, utterly unsubstantiated. Janis and Schonberg repeat the rumor, offering no proof of their own. And you not only vociferously insist that the rumor is true, but you revert the edits of anyone who dares contradict you. So the question remains: why such emotional editing on your part? Better Wiki policy is: if you have a fact to offer, give us the proof. Otherwise, it's not appropriate for a Wiki article. LeonardoCiampa (talk) 16:42, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

Formal mediation of the dispute relating to Vladimir Horowitz has been requested. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. For an explanation of what formal mediation is, see Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Policy. Please now review the request page and the guide to formal mediation, and then, in the "party agreement" section, indicate whether you agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page.

Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 19:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for mediation concerning Vladimir Horowitz, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. An explanation of why it has not been possible for this dispute to proceed to formal mediation is provided at the mediation request page (which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time). Questions relating to the rejection of this dispute can be directed to the Committee chairperson or e-mailed to the mediation mailing list. For more information on other available steps in the dispute resolution process, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 23:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Tamara Brooks

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tamara Brooks, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://tamarabrooksconductor.com.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 02:31, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Tamara Brooks. LeonardoCiampa (talk) 02:35, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tamara Brooks

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tamara Brooks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ridernyc (talk) 03:10, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note, however, that section A7, which is quoted as the reason for deletion, is the very reason why the article was deleted in error: It is irrelevant whether the claim of notability within the article is not sufficient for the notability guidelines. If the claim is credible, the A7 tag can not be applied. Often what seems non-notable to a new page patroller is shown to be notable in a deletion discussion. LeonardoCiampa (talk) 11:37, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is user:RHaworth_and_heavy-handed_use_of_WP:CSD.23A7. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:51, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ME

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Toccata quarta (talk) 03:19, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alfred Zappala

The article Alfred Zappala has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Fiddle Faddle 10:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:AlfredZappala.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:AlfredZappala.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blurred Lines 11:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alfred Zappala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alfred Zappala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Zappala until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 11:16, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While searching for sources you may find this essay to be of use Fiddle Faddle 14:26, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alfred Zappala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of New England (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:57, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]