User talk:Liam Óg Ó Nualláin

December 2018

Hello, I'm Hummerrocket. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Brachypelma boehmei— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Hummerrocket (talk) 21:50, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edit

Hi there. Thanks for your improvement to the infobox at Brachypelma boehmei, but I had to remove the text you added to the lead section. See WP:LEAD; this section should provide an overview summary of the article, not introduce material that isn't covered in the article body. You're new here, so it will take a while for you to learn the all the editorial guidelines.

We all have occasional lapses in judgment, as was the case with the editor who posted the warning above. He has apologized on his talk page.

Regarding the text you added: please also see WP:NOTHOWTO. Wikipedia isn't a place to give "how to" advice, especially when it isn't cited to verifiable and reliable sources (er, see WP:Verifiability and WP:RS too - sorry for inundating you with guidance documents). If you have experience with this species of tarantula, please consider improving the last section of the article about keeping them as pets before you change the lead section.

If you need any help or advice, feel free to leave a note on my talk page, or you can post a question at Wikipedia:Teahouse (for editorial or content questions) or Wikipedia:Help desk (for help with editing). ~Anachronist (talk) 22:30, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your last edit: Don't insert opinions into articles. Wikipedia articles shouldn't promote causes. As a rule, anything you add should be attributable to a reliable source. Also with the Latin binomial names, the species is lowercase. I've made some corrections. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:10, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyriopagopus Minax (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia cannot be a reference. Add other ones that cover this in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cyriopagopus Minax and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cyriopagopus Minax, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:32, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Liam Óg Ó Nualláin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:32, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyriopagopus Minax (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Submission requires reliable sources. Pop-culture books and websites about keeping tarantulas as pets are generally not considered reliable for the scientific information needed regarding animal species.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cyriopagopus Minax and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cyriopagopus Minax, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:33, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyriopagopus minax (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still no reliable sources. See the discussion at User talk:WikiDan61.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cyriopagopus minax and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cyriopagopus minax, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:18, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm CoolSkittle. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:Fortnite Monopoly have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CoolSkittle (talk) 10:54, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyriopagopus minax (January 15)

{{subst:Afc decline|full=Draft:Cyriopagopus minax|cv=no|reason=v|details=|reason2=|details2=|comment=Sadly, this is still not properly sourced. I looked up the Check List reference. It does indeed mention the species, in the context of, Several families that are rare and poorly known in Thai- land were recorded.... That's not enough to write an encyclopedia article.

I searched [jstor.org JSTOR] for Cyriopagopus minax, and (surprisingly) came up with a total blank. I also tried searching [[www.biodiversitylibrary.org BHL], with similarly poor results. I found hits for Cyriopagopus, but not "Cyriopagopus minax". I also found hits for minax alone, but those all look like they're Uca minax, a kind of fiddler crab. If there's nothing in either JSTOR or BHL, I'd be hard pressed to say this meets WP:V, regardless of the many mentions in random non-RS, and/or the single mention in Check List.|sig=yes}}

Your draft article, Draft:Cyriopagopus minax

Hello, Liam Óg Ó Nualláin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cyriopagopus minax".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 03:32, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]