User talk:Lily Wan Jo

Lily Wan Jo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lily Wan Jo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:08, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Reference formatting

Your first ref.^[1]

In a format used for websites.^[2]

You can copy the content between the double brackets {{ }} and replace the content inside with the information at the reference website. I find the best way to do this is in my Sandbox, and when sure no errors, cut/paste into draft or article. David notMD (talk) 11:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Lily Wan Jo! You created a thread called Question of publishing at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Lily Wan Jo! You created a thread called QUESTIONS/ REPLY TO MoonyTheDwarf & David notMD at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Imam Shah (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by QueerEcofeminist were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Imam Shah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Imam Shah, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 06:46, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Imam Shah

Hello, Lily Wan Jo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Imam Shah".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

^ https://www.straitstimes.com/lifestyle/entertainment/nurul-aini-and-imam-shah-are-the-most-popular-malay-tv-personalities-with
^ Hadi, Eddino Abdul (12 April 2015). "Nurul Aini and Imam Shah are the most popular Malay TV personalities with viewers here". The Straits Times LIFESTYLE. Retrieved 19 January 2020.

[1] ttps://www.straitstimes.com/lifestyle/entertainment/nurul-aini-and-imam-shah-are-the-most-popular-malay-tv-personalities-with

[2] Hadi, Eddino Abdul (12 April 2015). "Nurul Aini and Imam Shah are the most popular Malay TV personalities with viewers here". The Straits Times LIFESTYLE. Retrieved 19 January 2020.

[1]

[2]