User talk:LittleA65

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia.

You were right to add a disambiguator to the article though the normal convention is to use a lower case "(scientist)" but that can be sorted out when it is moved to main space.

To get things moved to main space you need to submit the article to the articles for creation process. You can do this by adding {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article to alert the reviewers that you are ready for a review. This may tike some time as there are currently 2,282 pending submissions to be reviewed.

Regards

Keith D (talk) 14:10, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ian Charles (Scientist) (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AaqibAnjum was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ian Charles (Scientist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ian Charles (Scientist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 18:15, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LittleA65! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 18:15, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ian Charles (Scientist) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submissio

Since this is your only contribution, and since it is written in exactly the format of a press release, it is reasonable to ask whether you are a connected contributor, in which case you must declare the connection. Please see our rules on Conflict of Interest If you are writing this for pay or as a staff member of the organization, see also WP:PAID for the necessary disclosures.

This reply here, and on the draft, and then I shall review it DGG ( talk ) 05:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if this is how best to reply but here goes. It's not my only contribution to wikipedia as I've edited a number of existing pages, but it is my first attempt at creating a new page (and at this rate, my last). I worked on The Norwich Research Park for over 30 years and retired earlier this year. I thought I would spend some time updating various NRP related pages on wikipedia and contribute new content on related topics. As the Director of the Quadram Institute was absent from wikipedia I thought I would start by adding a page on him. I have read the article on encyclopedic style and am finding it difficult to see why the Ian Charles page is being rejected. Any specific examples of how I can rewrite the article to meet your criteria would be extremely helpful at this stage.

OK, I shall take another look atthis tomorrow. DGG ( talk ) 06:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ian Charles (Scientist) (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You've not provided any references that provide any biographical information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ian Charles (Scientist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ian Charles (Scientist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 01:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As encyclopedias are tertiary, we don't actually write about the subjects of our articles; instead, we write about what has been written about the subject in reliable secondary sources. Every word, thought and idea in the article must be paraphrased from reliable secondary sources. John from Idegon (talk) 01:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, the criterion is WP:PROF, not the GNG, and the need is to show him influential in his subject, which is the criterion for WP:PROF there. We do neeed a reliable source for the biography, but notability is usually shown by the publications DGG ( talk )

Your thread has been archived

Hi LittleA65! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Getting my tone right, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ian Charles (Scientist) (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Academic notability depends iupon the influence on the profession, which in his case is probably best measured by the number of citations to his most cited papers. Find them using google scholaror equivalent and add them

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ian Charles (Scientist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ian Charles (Scientist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 05:26, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ian Charles (Scientist) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ian Charles (Scientist). Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 00:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ian Charles (Scientist)

Hello, LittleA65. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ian Charles (Scientist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:04, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ian Charles (Scientist)

Hello, LittleA65. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ian Charles".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:18, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ian Charles (scientist)

Hello, LittleA65. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ian Charles".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:14, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]