User talk:Lolapolo

Lolapolo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lolapolo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello, I'm Kellymoat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tinashe have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Image changes are to be discussed on the talk page before they are changed. Kellymoat (talk) 03:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kellymoat (talk) 15:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at SweetSexySavage shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kellymoat (talk) 15:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lolapolo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been accused of sockpuppeting when this is the only account I have. I had edited using my IP before not realising that I was logged out, which I now understand is not allowed. However, I am not related to Leol12 at all. I have made positive contributions and have not committed vandalism, I believe being is a very harsh response. I hope this response will alleviate any issue that have arised about my conduct.

Decline reason:

It is simply not the case that you are completely unrelated to Leol12. We have confirmation that you are indeed related. You are welcome to make another unblock request and clear this up, but please don't claim you are unrelated. Yamla (talk) 20:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lolapolo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am confused as to the course of action that I should take next. I apologisefor any past misconduct that may have occurred out of ignorance. I merely wished to contribute which can be seen from through my activity on this account. I have no intentions of being a vandal or nuisance. Please may I be assisted with this matter, thank you. Lolapolo (talk) 05:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to make a request that addresses the specific problem that led to the block. The most important part of that is to explain your connection with Leol12 and, depending on that explanation, make a convincing case for why the problem will not happen again. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:25, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lolapolo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for any inconvenience I have caused, my only intention was to be helpful and useful. I made this account in November so that I could add information to a page about my favourite singer. I understand sockpuppeting is forbidden, and this is what I have been banned for. However, this is my only account which I had made in November with an IP situated in Canterbury. I have moved address to west London which might be why the IP is the same? Nevertheless, I can assure you this won't happen again. Lolapolo (talk) 18:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining this unblock request solely on the grounds that it has sat open since 2016-12-31 and no administrator has seen fit to lift the block. That is, you have failed to convince any administrator to lift the block and there's no longer any reasonable hope that this particular unblock request will lead to an unblock. This is without prejudice. You are welcome to make another request with a more compelling justification. Yamla (talk) 13:51, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser evidence does not depend solely on IP identification. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]