User talk:Luca2valhalla

Luca2valhalla, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Luca2valhalla! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Luca2valhalla! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:10, Wednesday, February 8, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Nothing significant to satisfy the applicable standards.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Luca2valhalla/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Luca2valhalla/sandbox

Hello, Luca2valhalla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Linguist^un Eins ^uno 16:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may not be aware, but if you want this sandbox undeleted, you can request undeletion. It would not have been deleted if you had removed the speedy deletion tag at the time. The issue of establishing notability remains, though and would have to be resolved before the article could be moved into mainspace. Let me know if you need help or advice on this. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 06:34, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple use of named references in an article

Hi Luca2valhalla, Thanks for adding the references to Cataract surgery. If you check the page history you will see that I have left them in the reference list, but changed the reference tags in the body text. This is simply a way to re-use already defined and named references without cluttering the text area with duplicates. I see that you have only made a few edits and are probably on the steep part of the learning curve, but it becomes easier with practice, and you are welcome to call on me on my talk page or by pinging from any other talk page if you are confused or need information on editing. It is one of the things I do. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 07:07, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I am still learning and appreciate your help and guidance. Luca2valhalla (talk) 18:07, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]