Thanks for experimenting with the page New York Giants on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Justin Eiler00:14, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Meadowlands Xanadu. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Meadowlands Xanadu, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.
I have noticed that you have removed the Nets proposed move to Brooklyn numerous times. Before you do it again, please state your reasoning on the Nets Talk Page. Otherwise, it will be pointless circle of it being deleted, then restored, then deleted only to be restored again... Thanks. Milchama 00:31 26, January, 2006
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Naconkantarie|t||c|m23:31, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Naconkantarie|t||c|m23:50, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As a courtesy for other editors on Wikipedia, please sign your talk page and user talk page posts. By adding four tildes (~) at the end of your comments, your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added. Thanks, and happy editing!
I've proposed four of your newly created articles for deletion. They are all on upcoming disney channel shows, and the problem is, you listed no sources as to where you got this information. Furthermore, I can't find any evidence, either via a google search or on disney channel's website, that any of these shows actually are being planned. If wikipedia is going to have these as articles, we need to have evidence that these shows actually are in development. --Xyzzyplugh16:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I've noticed you added a lot of movies to this article. If you take a look on the articles talk page, a few of us agreed to only list the next movie to air on the Disney Channel, as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Also, a lot of the movies you have added are not sourced, and most likley just internet rumours. Just wanted to let you know that they probably should be removed. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page. --lightdarkness (talk)02:59, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please cite where you are getting these future Disney Channel Original Movies from? Some of them are quite obviously not going to be made. Please reply on my talk page, thanks! --lightdarkness (talk)02:13, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've noticed you've been putting shows that are not cancelled and putting them in places making people think they are cancelled. Stop. I will keep reverting your edits. --Caldorwards421:29, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you keep putting down 2007 as when American Dragon: Jake Long will end as you did here [1]? I see that you are doing this to other Disney shows and your edits will be reverted. TrackFan17:42, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What a Teen Year has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this information might be inappropriate for Wikipedia because it is about something which has not happened yet. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so, citing sources.
If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 19:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Crimetime, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
