User talk:Maheshkumaryadav/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Maheshkumaryadav. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Ban notification
As a result of a community discussion, you are banned from editing any page on Wikipedia under any account or IP. Sandstein 16:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
The article List of scandals in Maharashtra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Already covered in List of scandals in India by state
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:07, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
The article List of Indian politicians convicted of crimes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Only two entries give undue weight. Poorly sourced.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:11, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
The article Media bias in India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article says nothing substantive. Poorly sourced.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:12, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Media bias in India for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Media bias in India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media bias in India(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 17:05, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
The article Environmental issues in Chandigarh Capital Region has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- First 2 "references" are to opinion sites, thus not reliable; third is a trivial point that would not be maintained in any more general article. With no remaining sourced information, this article should be deleted.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 23:45, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
The article Parks and gardens in Chandigarh Capital Region has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article dependent on "Chandigarh Capital Region" being a defined area. It isn't. Also, per discussion, Chandigarh Capital Region is no longer an article, and now redirects to Chandigarh.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:43, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
The article Transportation in Chandigarh Capital Region has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article dependent on "Chandigarh Capital Region" being a defined area. It isn't. Also, per discussion, Chandigarh Capital Region is no longer an article, and now redirects to Chandigarh.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:43, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
The article Economy of Chandigarh Capital Region has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article dependent on "Chandigarh Capital Region" being a defined area. It isn't. Also, per discussion, Chandigarh Capital Region is no longer an article, and now redirects to Chandigarh.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Template:Chandigarh Capital Region has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:57, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Visitor attractions in Chandigarh Capital Region
Category:Visitor attractions in Chandigarh Capital Region, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Chandigarh Capital Region
Category:Chandigarh Capital Region, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:29, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
The article Chiranjeev Rao has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Appears to fail Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Politicians, with his main claim to fame being inherited via his father. A youth section of a political party is not inherently notable.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 23:48, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Allegations of support system in Pakistan for Osama bin Laden for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allegations of support system in Pakistan for Osama bin Laden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of support system in Pakistan for Osama bin Laden (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SMS Talk 19:33, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
- Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
- Research: The most recent DR data
- Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
- Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
- DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
- Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
- Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?
--The Olive Branch 19:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Template:Pakistan and state terrorism has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mar4d (talk) 06:13, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Allegations of support system in Pakistan for Osama bin Laden for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allegations of support system in Pakistan for Osama bin Laden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of support system in Pakistan for Osama bin Laden (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mar4d (talk) 10:04, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Manmohan Tiwari listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Manmohan Tiwari. Since you had some involvement with the Manmohan Tiwari redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Redtigerxyz Talk 19:19, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Corruption in India
Template:Corruption in India has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Vanamonde93 (talk) 23:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Corruption in India
Template:Corruption in India has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Vanamonde93 (talk) 14:12, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of District Courts, Chandigarh
The article District Courts, Chandigarh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- So every district and many larger talukas in India have a district court and various other courts functioning under it. I see no reason why the legal infrastructure system of every district should have a separate article. This article claims no notability, fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:25, 20 January 2017 (UTC)