User talk:MangoTareeface9

MangoTareeface9, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MangoTareeface9! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Adrian Zenz, you may be blocked from editing. SuperGoose007 ^(Honk!) 03:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First please stop gaslighting me. The info I used were directly from his own book. I did not create personal analysis but just quoted the book. The book makes mention to an "anti-christian" tolerance campaign and that modern society was becoming incresingly secular and incompatible with the christian faith. It argues that in western countries, the laws that protect homosexuality from discrimination, are doing a lot of harm to the christian faith. That is not personal ansylsis but an objective summary of what the book literally wrote. https://books.google.com/books/about/Worthy_to_Escape.html?id=lRtSQB3HHJcC

I WELCOME you to please report me and let the Arb committee give their official decison on who is the actual bully here and whether my edits were "disruptive" or "constructive" /good faith. MangoTareeface9 (talk) 03:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard the above warning. However, you seem to be involved in a content dispute, so be careful with your edits. SuperGoose007 ^(Honk!) 03:59, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important notices

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 16:10, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi MangoTareeface9! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! — Newslinger talk 16:11, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Use of given names and surnames

Hi! Just a quick note, please use surnames instead of given names when referring to people within articles (e.g. Zenz instead of Adrian in this edit). From the Wikipedia Manual of Style: After the initial mention, a person should generally be referred to by surname only. Thanks! — MarkH₂₁^talk 17:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Sun Yang, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Please beware of WP:SOAPBOX. Normchou ^💬 19:09, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not original research. I quoted the Italian exactly on what he wrote and also you had no right to remove the info of all other SUN drug test results within the 2 weeks period of the incident. He been tested regularly and often only day earlier and already finished his main competition of the year. Calling it original research is a false excuse to remove it. MangoTareeface9 (talk) 04:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

However my issue was that the Italian judge wasn't condemned for criticising dog eating. He was using racist slurs and you left that out. But I see that you mentioned it so I won't challenge your edit. MangoTareeface9 (talk) 04:18, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 22:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MangoTareeface9. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:09, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]