User talk:Marcus.savage.0

June 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Eric Bolling has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Eric Bolling was changed by Marcus.savage.0 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862877 on 2016-06-04T00:14:13+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:14, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Just to be fair, I warned the IP user and I'm going to warn you as well. Please do not continue to revert.

Your recent editing history at List of Donald Trump presidential campaign endorsements, 2016 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. agtx 19:44, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. agtx 19:54, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Doug Weller talk 20:53, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pathological lying, you may be blocked from editing. This edit was unhelpful. You appear to be participating in edit war to vandalize this article by inserting a picture of Hillary Clinton. Msnicki (talk) 01:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michael T. Flynn. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:22, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm CataracticPlanets. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Yankee Stadium have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CataracticPlanets (talk) 04:31, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]