An invitation to the Teahouse!
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Your edits to Univention Corporate Server
Hi. For disclosure purposes, are you in any way affiliated with Univention or the UCS project?
Not to say there's anything wrong with that, the article you've written seems fair at a first glance. But I think you're approaching it wrong. To abide by the verifiability policy, it's best to start with finding sources, and only adding facts that are stated by the sources. -- intgr [talk] 17:21, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Thank you for your hint. I added a link to the Univention App Center as a resource which is reliable and always up-to-date about all the products avaialable in there. I hope this is fine. --126.96.36.199 (talk) 12:03, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Univention Corporate Server, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cyrus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)