User talk:MarkJoe224

This is MarkJoe224's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Larsen (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah Alam was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Larsen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Abdullah Alam (talk) 03:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! MarkJoe224, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Abdullah Alam (talk) 03:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Larsen (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MRD2014 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Larsen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—MRD2014 (talk) (contribs) 02:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mike Larsen has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mike Larsen. Thanks! Wiki Pancake ^{✉ 📖} 14:49, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, MarkJoe224! Thank you for your contributions. I am WikiPancake and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Wiki Pancake ^{✉ 📖} 14:50, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mike Larsen has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mike Larsen. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:23, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mike Larsen has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mike Larsen. Thanks! J-Mo 00:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Larsen (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only one article (TheHill) goes into any great detail about Larsen (while also not being a PRIMARY source). The other references are fine, but they're just one-line mentions and do not demonstrate notability. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Larsen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 02:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mike Larsen

Hello, MarkJoe224. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Mike Larsen".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 19:08, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mike larsen

Hello, MarkJoe224. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mike larsen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (talk) 12:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jackie Speier have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:21, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Jackie Speier. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Mr.weedle (talk) 00:38, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]