User talk:MarkWKidd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, MarkWKidd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - CobaltBlueTony 19:30, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Luray, Virginia[edit]

You seem to have a great interest in Luray, especially the caverns. Are you a native resident of Luray? My family names are Beahm and Judd. Anyone with those last names are related to me in some way. - CobaltBlueTony 19:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm actually just a fan. I currently live in Lexington, Kentucky but I hope to continue my research into the caverns and particularly the Great Stalacpipe Organ in Luray (whether that means relocating or scheduling more lengthy visits. Do you live there now? --Markkidd 12:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
No, but my maternal grandfather is from there, as was/is his whole family -- a large number of them, anyway. - CobaltBlueTony 14:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Complex partial seizure[edit]

I'm puzzled why you reverted to a version you found "troubling". Yes, I did read the talk page. If you read the article carefully, it doesn't actually say that St Paul is "creative" - he is included in a separate list of "great historical figures". I have already added links on the talk page that you if follow, would include discussion of St. Paul, Napoleon, van Gogh, Socrates, etc. IMO, such speculation regarding historical figures is fit only for a Sunday magazine, not a serious encyclopedia. The reasons for my edit were:

  1. There is no need for a general list of people posthumously "diagnosed" with epilepsy in this article. This is an article about complex partial seizures, not the history of epilepsy.
  2. The list of "creative" people with epilepsy does not include anyone with a firm diagnosis of epilepsy other than Dostoevsky. Indeed, of the creative people in List of people with epilepsy, it is only Dostoevsky that could be argued to have found any creative source from his epilepsy. Finally, it is not possible to be sure that he had complex partial seizures - which is the purpose of this article and the argument regarding creativity. PMID 16194626 reckons he had "an idiopathic generalized epilepsy with minor involvement of the temporal lobe" - but that is also just speculation.
  3. Rather than attempt to repeat the work of List of people with epilepsy, the reader can follow a link to that article and make their own mind up as to whether there are a significant number of "creative types" with epilepsy.

Regarding your edit: The use of a straight revert-to-previous-version is regarded as a hostile act on Wikipedia. It should really be reserved for vandalism or spam. In addition, your edit comment was insulting to me. If you have a problem with an edit made by a non-anonymous editor, leave a message on their talk page. Alternatively, if you think it best to discuss more widely, use the article's talk page - but take care not to get personal in an open forum.

I think we both agree that the current version of the article is unsatisfactory. Naturally, I prefer my previous edit, but there is room for improvement if you are willing to contribute.

Colin°Talk 09:10, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

"History" vs. "History and Conception"[edit]

My thought on knocking the heading back to just "History" is twofold. First off, I was interested in keeping the headings as brief as possible. In the headings, I believe that less is more. Secondly, how the organ was originally conceived seems to be a part of the history, and thus it can be shortened to just that.

So that was my thought process on shortening it. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:A_Mighty_Fortress_is_Our_God.ogg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:A_Mighty_Fortress_is_Our_God.ogg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 19:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Brett Ratliff (Musician)[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Brett Ratliff (Musician), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.myspace.com/cornbrett. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:57, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Brett Ratliff (Musician)[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Brett Ratliff (Musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 21:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

We have to be careful here[edit]

Hello Markkidd. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article June Appal Recordings, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:29, 15 June 2011 (UTC) a hill boy his own self

Thank you for your note, and please believe that I value transparency about conflict of interest. I am fortunate to have been able to turn several passionate personal interests or hobbies into employment during my career, making it important for me to maintain a high standard for my participation on wikipedia. Intermittent as it may be. Markkidd (talk)

Once again you have a very clear conflict of interest in advertising Appalshops's documantary in an article, directly linking to it rather than using it as a reference or otherwise. It may be relevant to discuss events in the documentary in the elk river article or to use it as a reference, the existence of the documentary itself is of little to no relevance. Once again it is conflict of interest Wikipedia:Spam Mycosys (talk) 14:08, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

In your position I would follow the advice of the COI article and post a request in the talk page declaring your possible COI and posting the information that is within the documentary that would be relevant and that it would be good to use as a cite, and asking somebody without a potential COI to make the edit.I am an activist myself so totally understand your passion and loved the doco btw - just posted as it was it comes out like an ad for the doco, not information on the relevant history of the region. I am not a hugely regular editor either but I think it may be relevant in a see also or related. If it has won awards the doco itself might be considered notable and worthy of an article linked to in the see also section. I am rather arthritic so not really up to writing a summation of the relevant history and mixing the bits form the doco with what is already there and ref-ing the doco amongst it but if you want to have a go and put it on the talk page and it fits WP:NPOV I or somebody else will have no issue putting it in place, or you could do it yourself iirc if you are VERY careful to keep NPOV but i believe it is 'strongly discouraged'. Its not a bad doco or info source - just what you had there was more like an ad for the doco not history in itself. Mycosys (talk) 14:39, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Great Stalacpipe Organ 60s 33 album cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Great Stalacpipe Organ 60s 33 album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 11:03, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Appalshop Building.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)