User talk:MashriqiUser

MashriqiUser, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MashriqiUser! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|~~~~}} below. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:19, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to be unblocked, you will need to use the account User:Ghazi ut din to request an unblock. If you no longer have access to the account, you may use this account to request an unblock. You will need to address the issues around sockpuppetry in any unblock request you make. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MashriqiUser (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to say I am sorry for the sockpuppetry on Ghazi ut din, but I forgot the password and this account is 100% used to edit Wikipedia for the good. I admit I was sockpuppeting Sultan of Spain and Turkey by Ghazi ut din. I swear that this account is not another sockpuppet. I learned and understand why I was blocked a few months ago and right now. So I think this is unfair. I like to request for undeletion of my draft.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:29, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

On review, I'm not as sure this user is a sock of this account. Although they have admitted it, other evidence I have found suggests otherwise (admins please email to get this evidence. Its not private, but its from offwiki). Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 17:08, 14 November 2020 (UTC) see comments later[reply]

What does that mean? Can you please unblock me?

The reviewing administrator will review your unblock request. The reason why I mention that is because of your userpage and its similarities to another account's actions elsewhere. I have requested checkuser to see if this is the case. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 17:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a sockpuppet of FdPATgg because it's from NOV 11 and Mashriqi is here since SEP 22. Can you please unblock me? I'm just wan to say I'm crying a little bit.

I'm just justifying mashriqi because you Op Barbarossa surprised me without warning and that I just wanted to move on but you just like quicksand dragging me into shame. I am sobbing.

A checkuser has performed a check and found that you are unrelated to FdPATgg. I was unable to see this technical evidence until a checkuser ran the check for me. The same check found that you are likely to Ghazi ut din, and that you have other accounts you have not disclosed. An uninvolved administrator will be here shortly to review the block. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On a side note, I apologize if you are upset. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:34, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It’s fine but let me tell you I forgot the password to Ghazi ut din MashriqiUser (talk) 21:52, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Can you unblock me because I am not a sockpuppet you know that if you act like this, people will hide the fact they are another account of the account which is banned for violating rule here in Wikipedia. Can I erase ghazi ut din and edit freely in peace?

We are all volunteers, so it may take some time for another administrator to review this. Furthermore, two other accounts which checkuser evidence suggests you control have been found, so this complicates the issue. In a few more days, another administrator will likely review this. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MashriqiUser (talk) 20:12, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah... I want to move on.

Hello MashriqiUser (talk) 09:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can I move on like how do I deleted my account and can I get one last chance?

Hello MashriqiUser (talk) 1:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Can you chat now!

Hello MashriqiUser (talk) 1:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I cant edit and can we talk. I want to edit Bahman Shah about the dates and the infobox. Can I get an expiration date? What did I do? I have got blocked in Ghazi ut din for 3 months and now I understand. I am not a sockpuppet, ok? If you cant, believe me, you will get confused?

MashriqiUser (talk) 1:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I am here because I got block numerous time, I got blocked in my other account. Now I understand why I got blocked before so can you respond... please, I promise won't continue this misbehavior again.

As your previous unblock request was declined, to start another unblock request place the {{unblock}} template again bearing in mind what was said above. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 17:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jazz I have been waiting but you haven't responded to me. You must have blocked me because you saw my page, I was blocked for sockpuppet on Ghazi ut din. You have not seen my line Please notify me if you are concerned and I now had and will use Wikipedia for the good. I have done nothing wrong in MashriqiUser, so why had you deleted the draft Kawthar? He is a real person who defeated the Khazar in AH 119. WADR, but you need to use some logic and patience so I may caution myself epiloguely.

Unblock requests are generally reviewed by a different administrator so that you receive a fair review. I make an effort not to review any unblock requests for blocks that I have made. Although I am happy to give you advice and/or suggestions, I won't be reviewing the unblock request so that you receive a fair review. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:57, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MashriqiUser (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked many time so now i understand why i am blocked1, I am willing to stop vandalizing Wikipedia forever2 and I will do useful controbution for eternity3, like I´ve did for 2 month SEP OCT NOV.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, (Mashriqi) I really don't know why you blocked me from editing. I have already been punished for sockpuppetry so yes, You don't need to block me when I already been blocked and I have learned my lesson and won't vandalize Wikipedia again. I frankly hadn't done anything wrong in MashriqiUser because of the time I was young and now I am mature. I have been following the rule for two months just to have you (Dreamy Jazz) block me for no apparent reason with 'Sockpuppetry' and you had to be tangle with an account that was younger and unrelated to me for a week so thus, you only just keep going and telling me that your underway to buy time for other Wikipedians to get your side and then every time I made an unblocked request you guy stalk for a month and then decline to give the same answer with little reason to put and again and again. You know, I am just calm but seem I will never be forgiven forever I guess. I bet your friend is Bot, and not really human with put the same answer and who would do that; Now I see this, I don't care about editing, this is not just to get over to vandalized again for this sincere stanza but (DreamyJazz) you say you can't unblock albeit you are the brain of this drama, with I won't be reviewing the unblock request so you can have a fair review and yes but I send an unblock request then I wait for a month, to have to decline and it's over 'two weeks' with Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia and it happens and happens again because you're using that to get more admin against me, I called this Unfair Review and Cronyism. I saw that I use to sockpuppet and I don't anymore finally you block me despite the many lines I said I talk to me before blocking me. You know what, I am sick of this and I don't care if you don't unblock me and I am a Muslim so I say Wallahi Billahi Tahalli |I mean I swear to God (Allah) I will not vandalize Wikipedia and use it for the good| so thus I quit the case. You hear me, You won!

The two administrators who have declined your review are both independent of me. They have acted on their own. The procedural decline does not mean that you can't be unblocked but is simply that your unblock reason was not enough to convince multiple administrators (including those who reviewed but did not comment) who have viewed your unblock request that you should be unblocked. If you want to make further unblock requests, do. If you decide to make further unblock requests, I suggest explaining in detail what you would like to do when you are unblocked (such as what area of editing you intend to edit in). If we trusted everyone on their word, it would be an easy route to people saying one thing and then continuing the behavior which lead to the block. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 17:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I love to focus on language videos like Eva speak Dutch and ancient history politicians. I need a reason for a block.

As has been explained before, you were blocked for using multiple accounts. The archived report is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ghazi_ut_din/Archive. I suggest using {{unblock}} to request another administrator takes a look at your unblock request. Be sure to make it concise, but also include where you would like to edit and some kind of commitment to not abuse multiple accounts would be helpful to. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I been blocked before and I finally understand. What did I do wrong in MashriqiUser? I need a shred of evidence in MashriqiUser.

Oh wait, none...I get it your blocking me to have some glory and buying time, meh you win the case.

I am not asking for unblocking requests because you keep buying time to have more admin against me so yes you win the case because I am quitting Wikipedia. I will never be forgiven and never will be and I will not push more to get unblocked because I will happen to be futile always like Sisyphus . Good luck.