Jump to content

User talk:MasterNoah2015

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, MasterNoah2015! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SudoGhost 04:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Hey there, I would like to politely ask you to stop changing "generally positive reviews" to "critical acclaim" in the Easy A article. Also, in my revert of your original edit I gave an edit summary describing exactly why I was reverting - in future if you want to contest someone you're better off talking to them on their talkpage, lest you become involved in an edit war. Feel free to tell me here or on my page why you think the film should be described as critically acclaimed, thanks. OohBunnies!Not just any bunnies... 22:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about consistency, but I think it would be better to change the wording from the intro, rather than the wording in the reception section, as that section includes less positive reviews, and to me "critical acclaim" should only be used to describe a film that reviewed quite impressively good reviews, and a higher than 72% rating on Metacritic. Also, in future, remember to post comments on a user's talk page (sorry if I did not make that clear), and to sign your posts with four tildes ~ <-- those things. Thanks, OohBunnies!Not just any bunnies... 23:09, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

[edit]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you.


RE: Edits to Justified (TV series)

and Drag Me to Hell

I have reverted your recent changes. It appears you have been warned about adding such unsubstantiated hyperbol to articles in the past but have not taken heed if it. PLEASE STOP with unverifiable/unsupportable claims like "The series has near universal acclaim from critics" and "notable universal acclaim." Refer to the Wikipedia Manual of Style if you need further clarification. Sector001 (talk) 23:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Social Network, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, -- Doniago (talk) 13:06, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]