User talk:Matcelz2

Welcome.

Hello, Matcelz2, and welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-08-05t11:33z

Kayla king deleted.

The article Kayla king has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Circle of Love (Kayla King album)

A tag has been placed on Circle of Love (Kayla King album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Falcon8765 (talk) 00:07, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wildfire (Kayla King album)

The article Wildfire (Kayla King album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and does not indicate notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-08-04t11:46z 11:46, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re [1], readers need to be able to verify references, e.g. you need to give the URL or publication name, date, and page numbers of the reliable, published, 3rd party source. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-08-05t11:29z

Proposed deletion of Wildfire (Kayla King album)

The article Wildfire (Kayla King album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Individual album by marginally notable singer, did not chart

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Herostratus (talk) 00:50, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wildfire (Kayla King album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wildfire (Kayla King album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wildfire (Kayla King album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Jeandré, 2011-03-07t19:38z 19:38, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Kayla King, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 01:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kayla King with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kayla King with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 01:55, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kayla King with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jim1138 (talk) 01:56, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kayla King

If you want to do major edits, please discuss them in talk:Kayla King before proceeding. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:01, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]