User talk:Mathematicalist

Welcome!

Hello, Mathematicalist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

April 2014

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Blackjack, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 04:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Blackjack, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:17, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:12, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Blackjack. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. In the interest of not fuelling an edit war I have left your added content in the article for the time being, but unless you can back it up with reliable sources it's extremely likely it will soon be removed by another editor or by consensus. Please note that all material in Wikipedia articles should be verifiable with reliable sources and that original research is not acceptable. In any case, do not make any further reverts without discussing the matter on the article's talk page. We have a rule called 3RR, or the three-revert rule, whereby reverting more than three times in 24 hours is considered edit warring; but it doesn't follow that reverting fewer times is not edit warring. Thank you. Sideways713 (talk) 09:38, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematicalist, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Mathematicalist! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Casino and Gambling Industry Bots and Proxies on Wikipedia

I am a Las Vegas person and therefore am immersed in the ways and means of the casino and gambling industry. Most people are fascinated with these industries but do not understand them. The only way to gain understanding of them is to attend industry conferences and trade shows and speak with industry leaders and innovators which is not easy for 99.99% of the people. But if done then it is crystal clear fairly quickly what the motive force of these industries is directed to. And the answer is obvious. To convince and entice and seduce and motivate and manipulate visitors to casinos online and on land and users of gambling games and devices to lose every cent in their pockets and in their bank accounts and available to them through their credit cards. No one in this industry will be quoted on the record out of fear of being ostracized from these lucrative industries. It is unfortunate that governments at all levels have embraced gambling as a means to shore up their revenues that are flagging as a result of our national economic depression that drags on and on with no end in sight that is being exacerbated by the unexpectedly large and irreversible and accelerating disemployment impacts of the virtualization and cloudization effects of ever more sophisticated technologies on our global economy. So as to Wikipedia. The global casino and gambling industries are keenly interested in manipulating Wikipedia content because of its prevalence and prominence. These companies maintain staffs of online resources that serve as their bots and proxies with which to manipulate Wikipedia content about their businesses, their executives, their intentions, their facilities, and most importantly their table games, electronic games, and slot machines. They seek to control the content and bias in a way that confuses visitors to casinos on land or online into believing that their chances of winning are much greater than they really are. But no no no no casino executive will allow himself or herself to be quoted so no no no no verifiable references are available and that is good for the casinos and gambling companies because then their bots and proxies can flag any and every clarification and correction to their propaganda as lacking verifiability. There are countless examples of this grist handed out as information in the panoply of popular and heavily visited and viewed casino and gambling listings on Wikipedia. A really great example is EZ Baccarat a version of baccarat that seems innocent and kind of cool on the surface but that was created by casino people for casinos to dramatically increase their profits from baccarat a highly addicting table game that is already seeing trillions of dollars in betting handle annually with no limit in sight. At the major industry trade show in September 2013 one of the inventors of EZ Baccarat was heard admitting bluntly to some of his exhibition booth visitors that the purpose of the Dragon 7 bet that he called "a sucker bet" is purely and simply to "distract the gamblers from focusing on the fact that one of the winning Banker 7 value hands becomes a push much to the advantage of the house". There were other admissions just as damning against this most anti-player pro-casino version of the venerable old game in the course of the sales pitch made to casino executives his prospective customers. So what happens when this kind of clarifying information is added to the baccarat page? The paid casino and gambling industry bots and proxies with nothing but time on their hands come out in force to engage in name calling and intention questioning as they play that boring old song called "Reversion Reversion Reversion Forever" until that decent but unpaid Wikipedian trying to fulfill the mission of Wikipedia finally gives up. The cost to Wikipedia is a loss of credibility and the purloining of its integrity to serve one of the world's most parasitical industries. The cost to casino visitors many of whom look to Wikipedia as a source of information is in the billions of dollars of losses. Anyone who edits Wikipedia articles related to casinos and gambling so as to eliminate credible clarifying information that can help casino visitors on land or online to be better players and to thereby lose less of their precious money well such persons should be assumed to be casino or gambling industry bots or proxies. If you are one of these casino or gambling industry bots or proxies and you know who you are then you should understand that what you are doing is wrong and is tantamount to fraud and deception. Don't try to justify your behavior because this is your job just go get another one that allows you to do good. Wikipedia is for the enhancement of the informed levels of people not for the casinos and gambling companies to lower the informed levels of people that they may be fleeced more easily. All Wikipedians should be very cautious when editing casino or gambling related article keeping always in mind that the probability is high that what is being edited may indeed be lies and deceit packaged prettily by these wealthy parasitical industries. That way one is not innocently duped into being their unwittingly ally their chump. Procedure should never be enshrined at the expense of purpose. Normally sensible procedures must never serve the interests of the bad guys and girls who lurk in every corner of the Internet including our beloved Wikipedia. In our daily doings we all need to remember that every moment in history is the sum and substance of all the decisions of every person on earth to either do or not to do either right or wrong things. Thank you good Wikipedians for standing guard against those who would pervert this good and decent institution.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DataDrivenOne, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

- Vianello (Talk) 02:34, 10 April 2014 (UTC) [reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Vianello (Talk) 02:44, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My second time was the same as the first

I give up on Wikipedia. My second time was the same as the first. Whenever you create or edit content that Wikipedia intensive private commercial interests have a stake in this reversion reversion reversion game goes on and on with anonymous creeps who accuse and accuse while excusing themselves. I am not a sockpuppet but it does not matter because Wikipedia is like everything else become a sinkhole for political correctness monitored by disassociated individuals who hide in their computer rooms. Shame shame shame. All my edits and comments were based on knowing what I am talking about and the accusations and reversionists could not care less about the real world implications of their inanity. So long. You all did something terrible here but I just cannot spare any more time with you and your nonsense.