User talk:Matheus15B

November 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Big Time Rush, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Big Time Rush, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. As before Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:22, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you create a malicious redirect, as you did at Big Time Rush, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Next Day (Haylie Duff album)

The article The Next Day (Haylie Duff album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article with no independent reliable sources that confirm the assertions of the text.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PauloHenrique ^{Can talk} 01:51, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Best Of Hilary Duff:Reloaded

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Best Of Hilary Duff:Reloaded, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 00:30, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Next Day (Haylie Duff album)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Next Day (Haylie Duff album), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 00:32, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jesuton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jesuton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesuton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 00:32, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Jesuton. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 04:29, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Matheus15B: Snotbot is not trying to delete your article. Snotbot is a computer program. Someone (a human) has nominated your article for deletion. It is currently being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesuton. After about 7 days, a decision will be made on whether the article should be deleted or kept. You should state your case on the aforementioned discussion page. However, the notice that is placed at the top of the article must remain there for the duration of the deletion discussion (which will probably end on 21 January). It cannot be removed, and Snotbot will replace it every time. These are simply the rules. If you continue to remove it, you might get blocked. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at User talk:Scottywong or you can ask for someone else by adding {{helpme}} to this page. ‑Scottywong | yak _ 22:39, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm Skamecrazy123. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesuton, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesuton with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 23:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Matheus15B. You have new messages at Skamecrazy123's talk page.
Message added 23:23, 17 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Skamecrazy123 (talk) 23:23, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Jesuton. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 06:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]