User talk:Mclean at WTI

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "WTI editor", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing this form, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Joseph Francois (economics professor)

Hello, Mclean at WTI,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Joseph Francois (economics professor) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Francois (economics professor) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:48, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Van den Bossche

Hi Mclean at WTI - Greetings, you created page do have reference, however, no inline citation was found. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs inline citation from independent reliable source for verification to gauge nobility criteria is met. Pls see reliable source - WP:RS, verification - WP:V, and notability WP:N. For webcite - see here WP:CITEWEB and its template Template: cite web. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Peter Van den Bossche

Hi, I'm Edaham. Mclean at WTI, thanks for creating Peter Van den Bossche!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I can't see any secondary sources outside of the subject's professional institutions which confer notability. Independent Reliable sources for academics should ideally come from outside the institutions to which they belong, otherwise they are basically writing their own Wikipedia article. Edaham (talk) 03:15, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Deletion discussion about Peter Van den Bossche

Hello, Mclean at WTI,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Peter Van den Bossche should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Van den Bossche .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Edaham (talk) 03:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: World Trade Institute (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:World Trade Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:World Trade Institute, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 10:33, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mclean at WTI! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 10:33, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: World Trade Institute (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:World Trade Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:World Trade Institute, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 07:31, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]