User talk:Melanie001
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Deletion discussion about Amer Huneidi
[edit]Hello, Melanie001,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Amer Huneidi should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amer Huneidi .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, scope_creep 09:05, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Amer Huneidi
[edit]Please be aware that once WP:AFD has deemed an article to be deletable, you cannot recreate the same article again unless you make major sourcing and content improvements over the version that was deleted. It doesn't mean that he can never have an article on here — but it does mean that you have to put a lot more work into making the new version better than the first one was.
If it's really that important to you that he have a Wikipedia article, then you need to do it through our articles for creation process, so that you can get feedback on how to improve it enough to get it accepted — but once AFD has weighed in, you're not allowed to just recreate it again without adequately addressing the reasons why it was deleted in the first place — if you create a version which still isn't properly compliant with our sourcing and content standards, it's allowed to be immediately deleted again as a "recreation of deleted content". Bearcat (talk) 21:25, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Amer Huneidi
[edit]Hello Melanie001,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Amer Huneidi for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fevrret (talk) 01:10, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Amer Huneidi for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amer Huneidi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amer Huneidi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep 09:10, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Amer Huneidi
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Amer Huneidi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AllyD (talk) 13:13, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Recreating articles
[edit]I can't see where you've addressed the reasons for the page's deletion. If you believe that the AfD was in error, you should bring it up at WP:DR, deletion review. Recreating the article without going through DR or proving notability via better/more sourcing can lead to you getting temporarily or permanently blocked from editing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:09, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- However, something to note is that coverage does not have to be in English. If there has been coverage in another language (such as say, Arabic) that would show that Huneidi is independently notable from Gulf Cryo, then that is usable as long as it is in a reliable place like a newspaper or the like. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)