User talk:Mikezarco

Please stop

Hey. Please stop submitting Draft:Confetti (Little Mix album) to AFC. You will be getting blocked and the draft will be deleted. I submitted the draft not even 10 days ago, and got penalized for it. This has already been seen as vandalism. Please stop. Please wait until the draft has everything the reviewing admin said it needs to have (look at the pink top part). Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 19:45, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm sorry Mikezarco (talk) 19:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That’s fine, I accept your apology. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 19:49, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of En gång i tiden (Benjamin Ingrosso album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article En gång i tiden (Benjamin Ingrosso album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/En gång i tiden (Benjamin Ingrosso album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

lovkal (talk) 19:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but can you explain me what does this mean? If you mean that the page is unsourced, you can check Benjamin Ingrosso's official Instagram and you'll see that what I'm talking about is completely true and has no fallacies. Thank you so much. Mikezarco (talk) 19:24, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Mikezarco, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as En gång i tiden (Benjamin Ingrosso album), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! lovkal (talk) 13:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I've been a wikipedian for almost 5 months, but I'm not very clear about what will happen En gång i tiden (Benjamin Ingrosso album), is it going to disappear? Thank you for your help. Mikezarco (talk) 14:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The link to En gång i tiden (Benjamin Ingrosso album) will likely be redirected to Benjamin Ingrosso, where an entry with the album name may be found. The gist of the policy (WP:NALBUM) that I cited in the deletion discussion is that albums are not notable just because their creator is notable. The album itself must have significant coverage by reliable sources that are independent of each other. To justify its own article, the album is going to need coverage in multiple newspapers, for example. lovkal (talk) 14:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology

Hey! Please note that album pages are only supposed to have one chronology per Infobox, per consensus. Please note that all chronologies must be a link of blue links not linking to a relevant discography page. To put this into easier terms, the Benjamin Ingrosso pages should only have one chronology, and it should only link to album pages, so my edits were correct. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 18:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please start leaving edit summaries and not just blatantly reverting my edits? I know you know how to use them, you have demonstrated that before. Edit summaries are preferred, so that other editors know what the reason for your edit was. Just blatantly reverting my edits without explanation leaves it up for me to decide. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 19:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, I've been ill and that changes my way of being Mikezarco (talk) 20:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, get better soon! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 20:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Mikezarco reported by User:JJPMaster (Result: ). Thank you. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 16:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 16:58, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm the real Mikezarco, I've been problems with the security of my account, but a few minutes ago I noticed that I had my account opened in a friend of mine's device, so I texted her and she told me that it was her who has done all these things, so she understand about Wikipedia stuff and all that. I'm so sorry about what has happened and I hope that my account isn't blocked anymore, and I apologise if there's something that isn't understood so I'm Spanish, my real name is Miguel Zarco, not Mike. Thank you and sorry for all that had happened and it won't happen ever again. Mikezarco (talk) 17:44, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that it has been compromised. If your account is locked, please contact ca

wikimedia.org. Otherwise, if you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then add this below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}}.RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm the real Mikezarco, I've been problems with the security of my account, but a few minutes ago I noticed that I had my account opened in a friend of mine's device, so I texted her and she told me that it was her who has done all these things, so she understand about Wikipedia stuff and all that. I'm so sorry about what has happened and I hope that my account isn't blocked anymore, and I apologise if there's something that isn't understood so I'm Spanish, my real name is Miguel Zarco, not Mike. Thank you and sorry for all that had happened and it won't happen ever again. Mikezarco (talk) 17:42, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Mikezarco

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikezarco (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I'm the real Mikezarco, I've been problems with the security of my account, but a few minutes ago I noticed that I had my account opened in a friend of mine's device, so I texted her and she told me that it was her who has done all these things, so she understand about Wikipedia stuff and all that. I'm so sorry about what has happened and I hope that my account isn't blocked anymore, and I apologise if there's something that isn't understood so I'm Spanish, my real name is Miguel Zarco, not Mike. Thank you and sorry for all that had happened and it won't happen ever again. Mikezarco (talk) 17:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since someone else has accessed your account, it is no longer eligible to be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 18:49, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It is a friend of mine who had accesed to my account Mikezarco (talk) 18:57, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mikezarco, I believe that in this certain case, you need to contact a CheckUser to request an unblock, so that they can confirm that you are actually the person who posted this message. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 19:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And how can I contact a CheckUser? Please help me. Mikezarco (talk) 21:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you just forgot to log out before vandalizing this time. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not like that. Mikezarco (talk) 07:20, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My block

Hello, I'd like to know if my account is going to be unlocked one day Mikezarco (talk) 19:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You can contact a CheckUser through the functionaries mailing list. lovkal (talk) 19:43, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lovkal: For future reference, the functionaries list does not accept unblock requests; because it is an archiving list, we can't talk about anything that involves CU data there. If a blocked user does not contact a CU directly or use UTRS, the next step of appeal is ArbCom. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 02:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@L235: Ah, gotcha. lovkal (talk)

I don't really know how to do that, if you can tell them this I would be really grateful: Hi, I would like to ask you for some help, so my account has been blocked and everything that had happened has been an error. A few days ago I used my friend's phone for editing some wikipedia articles because I didn't have charge in my phone, and I forgot to log out, and apparently she made me a "joke" editing all those articles (vandalism) with my account, but it wasn't me. I thought that I was hacked, so I said it, but then, I noticed about what happened, and I'm not hacked, that was my friend. I apologize for all this and it won't happen ever again, thank you. Mikezarco (talk) 23:46, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikezarco (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I would like to ask you for some help, so my account has been blocked and everything that had happened has been an error. A few days ago I used my friend's phone for editing some wikipedia articles because I didn't have charge in my phone, and I forgot to log out, and apparently she made me a "joke" editing all those articles (vandalism) with my account, but it wasn't me. I thought that I was hacked, so I said it, but then, I noticed about what happened, and I'm not hacked, that was my friend. I apologize for all this and it won't happen ever again, thank you. Mikezarco (talk) 23:47, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

WP:COMPROMISED, no verifiable evidence presented to show otherwise. However, this user is free to create a new account, declare as required under WP:SOCK, and continue editing. Yamla (talk) 15:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There's not enough specific information here for me, a checkuser, to take action. Which specific edits (or what specific date/time range and timezone) were performed by your malicious "friend"? There are at least two devices here, a tablet and a phone, but possibly more than two. Which specific devices do you use? Which specific devices does your "friend" use? Which of you edit using a browser and which of you edit using an app? What specific steps have you taken to regain control of your account? --Yamla (talk) 23:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, my friend uses a phone, but I use a phone and tablet. I use the browser in the tablet and the app in the phone. I just talked to her and I secured that she had my account logged out, and she doesn't have my account on her phone since that anymore, she used the browser on her phone. Mikezarco (talk) 00:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't answer my specific questions. Nor is her claim that she logged out, sufficient here. We know your friend acted maliciously and so she has demonstrated she cannot be trusted in this matter. --Yamla (talk) 00:24, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, what should I do now? Mikezarco (talk) 00:27, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you cannot provide verifiable evidence that you have regained control of your account (that is, evidence that we can verify), there's nothing more to be done here on this account. If you are able to provide that and if you are able to answer the specific questions I have asked above, please do so. --Yamla (talk) 00:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, even if you are unable to unblock this account, I (and I expect RickinBaltimore, the blocking admin) would be okay with you setting up a new account, clearly disclosing that fact on both user pages, and editing under that new account. WP:SOCK has more information. Please verify this with your blocking admin prior to proceeding, however. --Yamla (talk) 00:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) I concur. We can’t take your friend's word for it if she purposely acted maliciously.

If you look at List of image-sharing websites, you can see multiple websites that allow you to share photos. I suggest you and Yamla coordinate as to what service you both have access to. Then, you can upload evidence that your friend has logged out of your account on Wikipedia. Other forms of evidence:

How many devices have been used to log into your account (different IP addresses can also be given, but not through Wikipedia)
Proof that you and her talked about never logging into your account again
Proof that you have the app installed on your phone, along with edits you made from your phone (they all should be tagged with "iOS app edit")
Proof that you use a browser on your tablet, along with edits you made from your tablet (they should all be tagged with "Mobile edit")
Proof that you have taken the necessary steps to make sure your friend never logs into your account again. If your unblock request is granted and she makes more malicious edits, that will be seen as meatpuppeting and will result in you being blocked indefinitely. Remember: you are responsible for all the actions made from your account
If you have a committed identity, now would be a good time to use it. If you don’t and you are unblocked, you should definitely look into it
And more

I’m sure Yamla would appreciate you giving as much evidence as possible. Any and every piece of evidence you can give from the list above will only help your case, not hurt it. Even if I didn’t list it but you think it will help, share it. If you choose not to provide evidence, this turns into a "my brother did it" situation. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 01:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

here there are the photos with the proofs, the conversation is in spanish Mikezarco (talk) 09:23, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, we can't trust your friend's word, as your friend has shown that she is not trustworthy with regard to Wikipedia. Therefore, a conversation with your friend is insufficient. I'm afraid if this is the best you can do, this is the end of the line for this account. Other admins are free to take a different approach, but WP:COMPROMISED is the policy that applies here. --Yamla (talk) 11:37, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I saw this from the functs-en-owner email. Mikezarco, rather than unblocking this account, what policy requires us to do is what Yamla said earlier: I (and I expect RickinBaltimore, the blocking admin) would be okay with you setting up a new account, clearly disclosing that fact on both user pages, and editing under that new account. WP:SOCK has more information. Please verify this with your blocking admin prior to proceeding, however. This is much easier than trying to set up some verification mechanism for this specific account to be unblocked, which is highly unlikely to work. If this is what you want to do, please say so here and ping RickinBaltimore to this discussion. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 03:04, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Mikezarco's friend

Hello, I would like to apologize to everybody for making what I have done, it was completely my fault, I have his account logged out, because he got very angry with me and he wouldn't talk to me if I don't do this. (ps: He asked me to remove the drive archive because he didn't want his email to be public.) Please, unblock his account, he hasn't done anything, it's all my fault. He loves editing Wikipedia and now I ruined it... He is always talking about it and he tries to do his best all the time here. I hope this consider miguel's block to be removed. thanks you, A.S. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.4.245.243 (talk) 18:44, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have proof? As stated in an above section, your word can’t be trusted as you acted maliciously on Wikipedia. @Yamla: courtesy ping to the CheckUser who has been following this discussion thus far. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 19:09, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]