User talk:Mlamarre79

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Mlamarre79! I am A8UDI and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

TomA 8 02:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Universal Noir Collection[edit]

The article Universal Noir Collection has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced stub

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:25, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paramount Centennial Collection[edit]

The article Paramount Centennial Collection has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability and reads like an advertisement (as per last PROD)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dougweller (talk) 04:37, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miramax Award-Winning Collection[edit]

The article Miramax Award-Winning Collection has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 21:48, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MGM Western Legends[edit]

The article MGM Western Legends has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 21:49, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MGM World Films[edit]

The article MGM World Films has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 21:49, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Universal Studio Selections[edit]

The article Universal Studio Selections has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 21:50, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MGM Decades Collection[edit]

The article MGM Decades Collection has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 21:50, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paramount Centennial Collection[edit]

The article Paramount Centennial Collection has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 21:52, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Universal Studio Selections for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Universal Studio Selections, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Studio Selections until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 15:15, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MGM Decades Collection for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article MGM Decades Collection, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MGM Decades Collection until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 15:17, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MGM Western Legends for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article MGM Western Legends, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MGM Western Legends until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 15:17, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miramax Award-Winning Collection for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Miramax Award-Winning Collection, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miramax Award-Winning Collection until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 15:18, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MGM World Films for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article MGM World Films, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MGM World Films until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 15:21, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DVD "labels"[edit]

You need to start coming up with sources for your claims that these marketing brands are separate DVD labels - otherwise I will have no choice but to report you for edit-warring if you continue to insert them. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I've struck a nerve. If you continue to undo my contributions I will have no choice but to seek mediation and then arbitration. The evidence in my favor is indisputable: Your actions towards my contributions are a blatant case of spiteful and petty wiki bullying. I edited a page on your watchlist which in your opinion was superfluous so you undid it. I defied your unfounded opinion and kept my changes which lead you in-turn to revert my contributions on several different pages in retribution. I continued to hold my ground and undid your childish vandalism and this has lead you to propose for deletion every single article I've created. One only has to look at your talk page to see you have a history of spite editing while my record is flawless. You also seem to be more concerned with removing content from Wikipedia as opposed to contributing it. This is your final warning - abstain from all actions regarding my contributions or I will be forced to to pursue the full suspension of your Wikipedia privileges.

By the way: la·bel [ láyb'l ] noun (plural la·bels) informative item attached to something: a piece of paper, fabric, or plastic attached to something to give instructions about it or identify it; brand: a brand name of some items.

Thank you.Mlamarre79 (talk) 20:13, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Universal Western Collection[edit]

The article Universal Western Collection has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zane Grey Western Classics[edit]

The article Zane Grey Western Classics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Columbia Western Classics[edit]

The article Columbia Western Classics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MGM Contemporary Classics[edit]

The article MGM Contemporary Classics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:35, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Miriam Collection[edit]

The article The Miriam Collection has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miramax Classics[edit]

The article Miramax Classics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paramount Centennial Collection[edit]

The article Paramount Centennial Collection has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MGM Vintage Classics[edit]

The article MGM Vintage Classics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MGM Movie Legends[edit]

The article MGM Movie Legends has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 20th Century Fox Award Series[edit]

The article 20th Century Fox Award Series has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Universal Legacy Series[edit]

The article Universal Legacy Series has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:41, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 20th Century Fox Collector's Edition Series[edit]

The article 20th Century Fox Collector's Edition Series has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 20th Century Fox Five Star Collection[edit]

The article 20th Century Fox Five Star Collection has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Columbia Classics[edit]

The article Columbia Classics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Martini Movies[edit]

The article Martini Movies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paramount Centennial Collection for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Paramount Centennial Collection, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paramount Centennial Collection until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 15:08, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Warner Home Video. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:19, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MGM Movie Legends for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article MGM Movie Legends, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MGM Movie Legends until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Martini Movies for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Martini Movies, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martini Movies until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 20th Century Fox Five Star Collection for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article 20th Century Fox Five Star Collection, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20th Century Fox Five Star Collection until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:22, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 20th Century Fox Collector's Edition Series for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article 20th Century Fox Collector's Edition Series, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20th Century Fox Collector's Edition Series until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:22, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Universal Legacy Series for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Universal Legacy Series, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Legacy Series until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:23, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 20th Century Fox Award Series for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article 20th Century Fox Award Series, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20th Century Fox Award Series until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:23, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MGM Vintage Classics for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article MGM Vintage Classics, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MGM Vintage Classics until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:24, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miramax Classics for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Miramax Classics, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miramax Classics until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:24, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Miriam Collection for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article The Miriam Collection, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Miriam Collection until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:25, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MGM Contemporary Classics for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article MGM Contemporary Classics, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MGM Contemporary Classics until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:25, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Columbia Western Classics for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Columbia Western Classics, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columbia Western Classics until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:25, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zane Grey Western Classics for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Zane Grey Western Classics, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zane Grey Western Classics until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:25, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Universal Western Collection for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Universal Western Collection, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Western Collection until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:26, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your reply is requested[edit]

Hello, Mlamarre79. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columbia Western Classics.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Guoguo12 --Talk-- 02:28, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Columbia Classics[edit]

The article Columbia Classics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection of otherwise notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 15:22, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Columbia Classics for deletion[edit]

The article Columbia Classics is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columbia Classics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 15:32, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in awards[edit]

I'm impressed by your rate of article creation, but please take more care in citing your secondary sources when it comes to awards. I've noticed a trend in your work, in which you call a nomination a win, such as Robert Morin, or a win a nomination (and for the wrong Genie), as with Louis Bélanger's double win for best new director and best screenplay for Post Mortem. Perhaps you're simply pasting the same text from article to article and not double checking it. Anyway, I've made the corrections in these two cases, but I suspect there may be others, and I recommend you take a moment to double check your WP:RS to see if you've attributed awards/nominations correctly. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:39, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A humble offer of appreciation[edit]

		The WikiProject Film Award
		I, Shawn in Montreal (talk), hereby award Mlamarre79 the WikiProject Film Award for his/her valued contributions to WikiProject Film. For outstanding work on Canada and Quebec film articles! Awarded 20:40, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Xmen-animatedseries-brotherhoodofmutants.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Xmen-animatedseries-brotherhoodofmutants.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:18, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

The article has been assessed as Start Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:00, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Mireille Dansereau, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chzz ► 00:32, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dear wife 1949.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dear wife 1949.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Universal Backlot Series for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Universal Backlot Series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Backlot Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --wooden superman 16:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New Line Platinum Series for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Line Platinum Series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Line Platinum Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --wooden superman 15:51, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miramax Collector's Series for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miramax Collector's Series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miramax Collector's Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --wooden superman 15:52, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dear wife 1949.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dear wife 1949.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]