User talk:Moeed1991ahmad

Notability of Shaikhul Hind Mufti Mahmood ul Hassan

A tag has been placed on Shaikhul Hind Mufti Mahmood ul Hassan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Victao lopes (talk) 02:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Moeed1991ahmad! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Polly (Parrot) 02:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Repost of Shaikhul Hind Mufti Mahmood ul Hasan

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Shaikhul Hind Mufti Mahmood ul Hasan, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Shaikhul Hind Mufti Mahmood ul Hasan was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Shaikhul Hind Mufti Mahmood ul Hasan, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 09:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Allamah Shabbir Ahmed Usmani

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Allamah Shabbir Ahmed Usmani, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www31.brinkster.com/ak4thanvi/AWLYALLAH/deoband/hadhrat_allamah_shabbir_ahmed_us.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:18, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maulana Rasheed Ahmed Gangohi

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Maulana Rasheed Ahmed Gangohi, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www31.brinkster.com/ak4thanvi/AWLYALLAH/rasheed_ahmed_gangohi.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:46, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maulana Rasheed Ahmed Gangohi

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Maulana Rasheed Ahmed Gangohi, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www31.brinkster.com/ak4thanvi/AWLYALLAH/rasheed_ahmed_gangohi.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shaikhul Hind Mufti Mahmood ul Hasan

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Shaikhul Hind Mufti Mahmood ul Hasan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 12:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of Image:Shaykh.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shaykh.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:15, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Tableeghi Jamaat, you will be blocked from editing. Enzuru 05:54, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:MosqueInterior wideweb 470x313,2.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:MosqueInterior wideweb 470x313,2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:27, 16 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 03:27, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:MosqueCeiling wideweb 470x313,0.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:MosqueCeiling wideweb 470x313,0.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 03:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mosque1 wideweb 470x307,0.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mosque1 wideweb 470x307,0.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 03:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:1682416-Tashkent-s-Central-Mosque-1.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:1682416-Tashkent-s-Central-Mosque-1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 03:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Abdullah mosque.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Abdullah mosque.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 03:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios

Please stop adding them everywhere. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 04:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Auburnmosqueback.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Auburnmosqueback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 04:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mosquee alger 2.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mosquee alger 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 04:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Taqi-usmani.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Taqi-usmani.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 20:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

please say more==

If you come back here, as I hope you will, please rewrite any deleted articles, this time giving enough information that it is possible to tell how they are notable,including references providing substantial coverage from third party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases DGG (talk) 00:29, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Saam.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Saam.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ragib (talk) 20:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images gone

Hi Moeed1991ahmad, I've just deleted all of your uploaded images as they did not fit with Wikipedia's copyright policies. Please note that you cannot take images off websites or captures from videos and post them here with free licences. Only if the image was released as freely licenced by the copyrightholder (whomever took the image) can you do this; and even then you need to have a way of proving this. As a general guide any image you find on the Internet is copyrighted and may not be uploaded to Wikipedia. - Peripitus (Talk) 12:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]