User talk:Monucg

[snip / clean up]

All my images should have this...

Licensing

The above photograph, copyright (C) Cian Ginty.

The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that the copyright holder is properly attributed. Redistribution, derivative work, commercial use, and all other uses are permitted.

Image:Dsc00130.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dsc00130.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 23:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dsc00130.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dsc00130.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 23:32, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?

I'm confused. How is "The copyright holder allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that copyright holder is attributed" different from "The copyright holder allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that this photograph should not be reproduced unless the author is credited"? —Chowbok ☠ 19:05, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you can explain to me the difference between those two statements, I'll leave it at yours. Otherwise I'll change it to the other one, as it helps with categorization. Thanks. —Chowbok ☠ 19:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand how what I said was "nonsense", or your hostility. But whatever. —Chowbok ☠ 20:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Wiiate3_2006.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Wiiate3_2006.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:22, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

E3

Hello, im sorry, i dont understand who is Cian Ginty, they are no source, or maybe you are? I want to move all this image on Commons, but if i dont have this information its like a no source image. Thanks a lot. if you want to move then urself, your wellcome. fr:user:bayo 84.103.60.254 20:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inniscrone/Enniscrone

Hi. As someone who has edited the Inniscrone and/or Enniscrone page recently, you may be interested in this. Regards, --The.Q^(t)(c) 15:53, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:GTA5 on Xbox360 from day one.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GTA5 on Xbox360 from day one.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 01:22, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dsc00143.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dsc00143.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:14, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Cassells north east mayo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Cassells north east mayo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:23, 7 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:23, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Mayo echo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mayo echo.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:42, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:General_Post_Office_Dublin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:General_Post_Office_Dublin.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 08:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boothbabes at 2005.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Boothbabes at 2005.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:53, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Konami at e3 2005.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Konami at e3 2005.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 15:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]