User talk:Moonlight+BLONK

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ok Orchestra (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit.

You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

This is an unreleased album, and does not satisfy musical notability. Some of the sections of this draft are missing. Please resubmit when the album is released.

This draft has been declined because of notability concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.

This does not mean that the subject of the draft has been found not to be notable. It does mean that this draft, as written, does not establish notability. Notability should be established in the text of the draft, as well as by references.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ok Orchestra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ok Orchestra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moonlight+BLONK! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Thank U, Next

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thank U, Next you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of VersaceSpace -- VersaceSpace (talk) 23:01, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AN discussion

I've started a discussion about you at AN here. No trouble, just wondering how you're gonna go about implementing the suggested fixes at the good article nomination. --VersaceSpace 🌃 16:19, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you should be able to edit Thank U, Next now. I'm working on completing the review, please address the currently listed concerns. --VersaceSpace 🌃 19:54, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with the nom! Mjroots (talk) 05:11, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for going out of your way to make the article accessible for me to make the necessary edits. I look forward to the complete review. Moonlight+BLONK (talk) 05:25, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Thank U, Next

The article Thank U, Next you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Thank U, Next for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of VersaceSpace -- VersaceSpace (talk) 18:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Thank U, Next

The article Thank U, Next you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Thank U, Next for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of VersaceSpace -- VersaceSpace (talk) 20:42, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]