User talk:Morteza Bemani

Welcome!

Hello, Morteza Bemani, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Negari now, General Farsi for Universities, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GAB^gab 21:51, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Negari now, General Farsi for Universities

The article Negari now, General Farsi for Universities has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable book.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GAB^gab 21:51, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Somaye Sheikhzade

The article Somaye Sheikhzade has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sulaimandaud (talk) 05:28, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Javad Mojabi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Javad Mojabi was changed by Morteza Bemani (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87429 on 2018-09-25T19:57:56+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:58, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello Morteza Bemani. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Morteza Bemani. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Morteza Bemani|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:08, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear GSS (talk|c|em), Thanks for your kind message. Regarding you message it is needed to mention that I am not paid for none of my edits. I only edit articles which I am sure and make articles about people who I know them just to prepare precise info. In Farsi wikipedia I have edited as much as I could due to my free time. in the last 5 month I could not do much due to my spine ache (I could not edit with PC because I was only lying on bed). I think it is competely wrong you have the impression of compensation about me. I love wikipedia as my favorite way of doing a good job. If it was paid then good luck for me (Kidding). I hope you are now satisifed with my reply GSS (talk|c|em).

Best Regards Morteza Bemani (talk) 15:04, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying. Do you know Akram Pedramnia personally or professionally? GSS (talk|c|em) 04:06, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I know her professionally and personally. I know her by her famous translation of Ulyssus (written by james joyce) and Lolita by Vladimir Nabakov. I have all the details in her article consulting with her. I have given all the facts documented in her article. Unfortunately there is a big problem in Farsi wikipedia which is not going under a well route. in English wikipedia it is much more accepted to work. Morteza Bemani (talk) 04:17, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please disclose your conflict of interest on your user page using {{UserboxCOI}} template and be sure to read and follow the COI guideline here. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:26, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear GSS (talk|c|em) Thanks for your kind reply. I wish I can do my best to follow the wiki guidelines. I will do the procedure you have mentioned but the whole discussion has made me upset besides the problems in farsi wiki. I hope I can handle it all. Best wishes Morteza Bemani (talk) 04:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Akram Pedramnia

Hello, Morteza Bemani

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Ubiquity and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Akram Pedramnia, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ubiquity}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ubiquity (talk) 17:54, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Akram Pedramnia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akram Pedramnia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akram Pedramnia (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ubiquity (talk) 16:15, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]