User talk:MoshiKun

September 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China was changed by MoshiKun (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852288 on 2016-09-18T15:47:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type {{ping|Linguist111}} before your message. 15:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type {{ping|Linguist111}} before your message. 15:59, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type {{ping|Linguist111}} before your message. 16:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type {{ping|Linguist111}} before your message. 16:02, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MoshiKun reported by User:Linguist111 (Result: ). Thank you. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type {{ping|Linguist111}} before your message. 16:05, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you have performed at Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:09, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm JohnBlackburne. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 14:54, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Transport in China, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 04:12, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Arabs, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 04:42, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Arabs, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 04:58, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Arabs. Jim1138 (talk) 05:19, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MoshiKun. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Han Chinese. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Molecule Extraction (talk) 08:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MoshiKun. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]