User talk:Movie...huh?

Welcome!

Hello, Movie...huh?, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as FireFly (film), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:41, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of FireFly (film)

The article FireFly (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film. Searches fail to find any information about this film or its stars. I suspect a possible hoax.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:41, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FireFly (2012 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FireFly (2012 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FireFly (2012 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnCD (talk) 21:35, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:55, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm blocking you because although you did not make the threat yourself, you did state on JohnCD's talk page that your boss was most likely going to use if the page was not reinstated and left on Wikipedia. That is a pretty clear legal threat and that is not tolerated on Wikipedia. Aside from that, not every film merits a page on Wikipedia, regardless of how useful you feel that it may be for other film actors or directors. (WP:ITSUSEFUL) I did not see where the film gained enough coverage to really pass WP:NFILM. JohnCD left a few other points about this on his talk page about what is needed for a film to pass notability and he also posted information as to why it is very inadvisable for someone with a conflict of interest (WP:COI) to write about something they're involved with- this instance is pretty much a very prime example as to why someone should not write their own film article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:55, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]