User talk:Mr Bungle/Archive1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Mr Bungle. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Welcome to the Wikipedia

Welcome, Mr Bungle/Archive1!

Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:

First, take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial, and perhaps dabble a bit in the test area.
When you have some free time, take a look at the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. They can come in very handy!
Learn about some of the Wikipedia landmarks by trying our Wikipedia scavenger hunt!
If you need any help, feel free to post a question at the Help Desk
Wikipedia has a vibrant community of editors. The village pump is a great place to see the goings on.
Remember to use a neutral point of view!
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time:

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page.

You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.

Best of luck, and have fun! – Clockwork Soul 13:37, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Irukandji syndrome

Been meaning to msg you for a while, but have had much laziness to contend with :-)

Wow and thanks. Verily you rock.

chocolateboy 11:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

re: RA

Ah, interesting source of references. My reference comes from the HyperRev magazines of Japan that focus solely on the Impreza, it's history and it's mods. I've actually sent an e-mail to Subaru of America to hear their response. Perhaps one can be sent to Subaru of Japan as they did build the Type RA versions. I will get a Japanese-fluent friend to do as such.

Sincerely, Impreza01 05:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Update

Interestingly, Subaru of Japan's official response in the e-mail is as follows: この度はご質問をお寄せいただきまして有難うございました。日頃はスバル車にご関心をお寄せくださいまして誠に有難うございます。

スバルインプレッサTYPE　RA－Rの「RA」の意味は、 Rがレーシング、AがグループAという意味を持っています。

今後共にどうぞスバルを宜しくお願い申し上げます。

＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊このメールボックスは発信専用です。改めてのご質問は富士重工業のホームページＦＡＱからお願いします。＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊

It translates to R = Racing, A = Group A (for WRC class, Group A racing)

Type RA marketting

The Type RAs were used to homologate for Group N rallying. I think the chassis was used for the Group A homologations before the 1997 change to the WRC class, aka Group A8. It is also possible that the acronym has changed over the years to adjust to what marketers need. I noticed the Legacy RS-RA, which set endurance records had RA as "Record Attempt". This was also shown for the 2005MY WRX STI Spec C Type RA that managed to lap the Nurburgring track under 8 minutes.

Serotonin Syndrome

Correct, I presume I forgot to log in. Thank you, much appreciated. Ken Gillman 08:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Deadly amanita

Fantastic dude, I shoulda realised - I checked a whole bunch of books and couldn't find it, then I googled but "Deadly Amanita" of course wasa disaster as it threw up ****loads of mere adjectives qualifying things.......and Benjamin was sitting in fronta me and I never checked..........cheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 13:47, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

...I can't bear the suspense.. I've nominated Amanita phalloides at FAC....cheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 05:34, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Benzodiazepine

Hello, Mr. Bungle,

The wikipeida article on benzodiazepines used to provide a link to a support website for a book I wrote on the topic. When I noticed that vistors were no longer coming to my website from wikipedia, I checked and saw that the external link had been removed. I replaced it, and then saw that you had removed it, apparently referring to my link as "spam."

The website for "The Benzo Book" contains information useful for people who may wish to discontinue usage of the drugs and links to online booksellers who sell the book. It also contains a downloadable pdf of the entire book which people can have for free, if they can't afford to buy my book. I have sold four hundred copies of The Benzo Book, but over two thousand people visiting the website have downloaded it for free. My interest is not to make money from this book but to share information that may be critical to people attempting to discontinue benzodiazepine use.

I ask you, respectfully, to reconsider your removal of the external link to my website. One of the other external links is to drugs.com. Above the information about benzodiazepines, drugs.com has Google advertisement links to buy Xanax on-line without a prescription. It would not be reasonable to believe that my website is spam while the drugs.com website is not.

The Benzo Book - Getting safely off tranquilizers and sleeping pills

Thank you, Jack Hobson-Dupont (monadyne)

Ipecac

OK maybe it was not appropriate, but did you watch that video? if not, i suggest you do as it is hilarious! Kitra101 00:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

What is WRONG with YOU People?

Find one place on wikipedia where it says it is no okay to link to a blog. I intend to reinstate the link the Common Album review. If people don't want click on the link they don't have to.

GA

I was quickly thumbing through some various GA nominations on the candidates page when I saw Mr. Bungle up for GAC. I though "What the hell, why not?" ;) Regards NSR77 ^T_C 01:52, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Presa canario

Thank you for your excellent work on the Presa Canario article! --AStanhope 06:25, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

FYI, I've used your wording in a sandbox on my user page (link). I've invited Frangible to add another paragraph per his recent comments at Talk:Perro_de_Presa_Canario. If you would like to help there, it would be most welcome. Thanks, R. Baley 21:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for continuing to keep a close eye on this one Frangible (talk) 19:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Cleanup on Spider bite

Thanks for cleaning up my reference. I need to be more careful about those things... --Hyperbole 22:21, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Bupropion

Excellent work on the Overdose section. Thank you! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 23:29, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

It looks really good. Thank you!Paul gene 02:28, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Drugs: Do not include detailed dosage and titration information.

Mr Bungle, I would appreciate your comments on the topic of acceptability of dosage and titration information on the MEDMOS Talk page. Thank youPaul gene 01:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Your editions of Sodium fluoroacetate

Mr Bungle, can you please explain why you removed a reference to the documentary on 1080? It is a first account of people witnessing and recording the effects. The video was broadcast on national TV channels and cannot be classified as unreliable. Please, undo that change or use the discussion where I asked about the reliability of the video if you have any concerns. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Envirozed (talk • contribs) 23:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

(Belated) Happy New Year! spam

Here's hoping the new year brings you nothing but the best ;) Fvasconcellos * (t·c) 15:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

The design of this almost completely impersonal (yet hopefully uplifting) message was ripped from Riana (talk · contribs).
Please feel free to archive it whenever you like.

Award

Great work! I gather you have the Bresinsky book..very handy. I was planning on getting Tricholoma pardinum to GA (and maybe FA) at some stage but was stuck trying to get a ref for it being mycorrhizal...and distribution is a real headache for all of them. Amanita ocreata is at FAC at the moment though Peter G. Werner and I have a differing views on what material may be extraneous to the article...cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, thing is where you wanna draw the line in the sand really...Bresinsky predates all the hoo-ha about Tricholoma equestre...does it have anything on toxicity in raw Blewits? I just ate my first Wood Blewit which are being sold in boutique markets in Sydney :) cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Casliber (talk • contribs)

(outdent) I thought the Wood Blewits were really yummy and we were at my mum's who cooked up some with pork and beans, though I think they tasted nicer in butter than in oil...I found Lactarius deliciosus fairly average, but Pleurotus eryngii really nice..Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Casliber (talk • contribs)

Update numero two-o

Wow, great work on the brain fungus! Where I am, uploading pages is insanely slow so I hope I didn't wipe anything with some rearranging. Does it seem logical the new way? Still needs some jigging of text which I can do when I get my refs availabel later on...Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:43, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Update

Now I am musing on which of Amanita muscaria and Gyromitra esculenta is closer to WP:GAN...I sorta like the former but there is quite alot of material to sort out yet....Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Har har, I canned Mr Sinebot as one can do on its talk page... :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The rock logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The rock logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:09, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Francis Petre

I note your repeated insertion of the inline citation tag. All articles go through FAR at some point, regardless of their condition, and placing inline citations in the article today will not stop it from going through FAR in the future. If you are concerned that the primary editors are made aware of your concern, a more effective method of advising them would be to notify the primary editor directly. In this case, that would be Giano. Alternately, a note on the talk page may be appropriate. There is certainly a strong feeling amongst many in the community that cleanup tags such as the one you are inserting are less than helpful; if you have concerns about the verifiability of the article, please consider helping to add the inline citations. The reference sources are all right there in the article. It strikes me there are tens of thousands of articles that have absolutely *no* reference sources where your tagging would be of more benefit; perhaps you might wish to give that some consideration. Risker (talk) 17:40, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

I reverted myself, I didn’t realise adding a simple tag would get this reaction, I figured placing inline citations in the article today would stop it from failing FAR. I cannot put inline tags in the article as the references are completely obscure (i.e. Wynn-Williams, D. B. (1982). The basilicas of F. W. Petre. MA thesis, University of Canterbury, NZ Historic Places magazine, June 1984, p10-11. March 1995, p33-34, New Zealand Tablet), I don’t think anyone but the primary author is going to be able to inline cite this article. It looks like you don't like cleanup tags and I tend to agree with your thoughts as I don't particularly like them either as they tend to make a article look a bit rough. On the other hand if the article is fixed up then they can easily be removed when the work is done. The point that there are "tens of thousands of articles that have absolutely *no* references" does not alter the fact that this article has no inline cites. So the helpful advice of an admin is to: go and tag all you the articles you want just not this one? :) Additionally perhaps you could follow up this edit/user [1] with a condescending note on their talk page also? Cheers Mr Bungle | talk 18:28, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

(In keeping with my usual practice of trying to keep conversations together, I've moved this over here. If you'd prefer, we can do it the other way and keep all the conversation on my talk page.)

Sorry for coming across as condescending, but repeated insertion of a maintenance tag on an article instead of communicating directly with a person sort of comes across that way too. You're probably right, the primary author may well be the only one able to do the inline cites, and he either has the article on his watchlist (in which case a talk page message would be the best course) or he can be reached on his own talk page if he is still here (which I happen to know he is, you can click the link I left above). Either would be preferable to sticking a tag on a Featured Article. There is a disproportionate drive to tag featured articles, for some reason, which is why those of us who work in the area become hypersensitive to being expected to drop everything and fix an article right away before a tag is removed. At the time of its promotion, the article's sourcing was checked out. The article is not "unverifiable", because its reference sources are listed. It simply doesn't have the same number of footnotes it would have if written today. Many featured articles are sourced with scholarly texts that the editors may have had to borrow from special access libraries, some of which are distant from their homes; I can think of a few articles, even some recent ones, where editors traveled some distance or had to make special arrangements to obtain access to these references. That is why when articles are on Featured Article Review, the only notice is on the talk page of the article, and an extended review time is provided. Maintenance tags are intended to be "fix now" issues that can be quickly resolved. Again, apologies if I came across as snippy. I don't really want you to go around tagging thousands of articles; I'd rather you do what you seem to have a real talent for, which is finding those reference sources and cleaning up those articles. Best, Risker (talk) 18:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:TheD4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TheD4.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Proposed deletion of Mr. Bungle discography

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mr. Bungle discography, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Content forking

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Canniba loki 17:03, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Clin tox.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Clin tox.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)