User talk:Msanders08

Science Feedback

On Science Feedback you have inserted "propaganda". I see from the edit history that you have done this repeatedly, despite being reverted. Have you read WP:EW? Peter Gulutzan (talk) 15:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is because the site is a left wing Marxist propaganda site censoring health professionals from informing the public. It is beyond their expertise to censor credible medical information from peer reviewed studies that are actually published on JAMA, The Lancet and NCBI. Wikipedia should not allow political propaganda from sites such as this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msanders08 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello, I'm SoyokoAnis. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Science Feedback, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. SoyokoAnis - talk 18:56, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You mean just like you provide references? I can do all this day long. You know that you are a propaganda site. Everyone knows it. The silent majority has been awaken. Time for the people to reclaim information and how it is treated. You censored peer reviewed studies that demonstrated that children who have been confined and masked are getting sick and that masks and confinement is the problem. In Canada's largest francophone pediatric hospital, we had zero pediatric cases n the PICU due to COVID-19. Zero. And yet we now have a crisis where our PICU is filled with young children with RSV and CMV infections like we have never seen before. In an open letter to our prime minister our physicians voiced their concern that children are not developing their immune systems as they should be and that we see an alarming rise in infections that did not affect as many children in the past. ICU RN and ECMO specialist for over 30 years here and original member of the pediatric SARS tactical task force team here. Stop censoring healthcare professionals and we will leave you alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msanders08 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please review WP:RGW, WP:BRD, and WP:EW. Possibly also WP:COI. --VViking_TalkEdits 19:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Msanders08

A tag has been placed on User:Msanders08 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VViking_TalkEdits 19:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial topic area alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 05:18, 17 February 2022 (UTC) [reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 05:20, 17 February 2022 (UTC) [reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 05:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Draft:Science Feedback. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Newslinger talk 05:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Science Feedback. — Newslinger talk 05:22, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. _signed,Willondon (talk) 05:40, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]